Element 68Element 45Element 44Element 63Element 64Element 43Element 41Element 46Element 47Element 69Element 76Element 62Element 61Element 81Element 82Element 50Element 52Element 79Element 79Element 7Element 8Element 73Element 74Element 17Element 16Element 75Element 13Element 12Element 14Element 15Element 31Element 32Element 59Element 58Element 71Element 70Element 88Element 88Element 56Element 57Element 54Element 55Element 18Element 20Element 23Element 65Element 21Element 22iconsiconsElement 83iconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsElement 84iconsiconsElement 36Element 35Element 1Element 27Element 28Element 30Element 29Element 24Element 25Element 2Element 1Element 66
Control Over Predominating Power of Opinion – Idea and Reality

Control Over Predominating Power of Opinion – Idea and Reality

The concept of “predominant power of opinion” from Article 26 of the State Broadcasting Treaty is a key element for ensuring diversity in broadcasting law. If one takes a closer look, however, it is quite uncertain what this concept means. What kinds of opinions? Which forms of influence could be seen as an 'exercise of power’? And is it even possible that shifts in the public opinion could be interpreted as a ‘predominance’ of a single company? Is it only about opinions on relevant topics for society and, if so, how are these to be determined? When does someone have power over it? And can the system of public opinion formation shift so that someone has a “predominant” influence? The Institute aims to address these basic questions in a project – as a prerequisite for efforts to adapt the regulatory approach to the challenges arising from media convergence. The concept of 'predominant power of opinion' is central for ensuring diversity in broadcasting law.
show more

Project Description

Answering these questions is an urgent matter because not only does traditional media gain more and more power in the process of opinion formation but also actors that control algorithms or offer services, which are based on “artificial intelligence” such as search engines. These new forms of internet-based communication can only be taken into account by using the construct of 'markets, which are relevant to the media'.

This fundamental research project on answering the questions mentioned above is currently in the phase of concept development.

Project Information


Duration: 2017-2019

Research programme:
RP1 - Transformation of Public Communication

Third party

Cooperation Partner


Contact person

Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Schulz
Director (Chairperson)

Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Schulz

Leibniz-Institut für Medienforschung │ Hans-Bredow-Institut (HBI)
Rothenbaumchaussee 36
20148 Hamburg

Tel. +49 (0)40 45 02 17 0 (Sekretariat)

Send Email



Subscribe to our newsletter and receive the Institute's latest news via email.