Element 68Element 45Element 44Element 63Element 64Element 43Element 41Element 46Element 47Element 69Element 76Element 62Element 61Element 81Element 82Element 50Element 52Element 79Element 79Element 7Element 8Element 73Element 74Element 17Element 16Element 75Element 13Element 12Element 14Element 15Element 31Element 32Element 59Element 58Element 71Element 70Element 88Element 88Element 56Element 57Element 54Element 55Element 18Element 20Element 23Element 65Element 21Element 22iconsiconsElement 83iconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsElement 84iconsiconsElement 36Element 35Element 1Element 27Element 28Element 30Element 29Element 24Element 25Element 2Element 1Element 66
Euromedia Ownership Monitor

Euromedia Ownership Monitor

The 15 European Union Member States on which media ownership information will be collected represent large and small states as well as Western and Eastern countries, including countries with identified risks to media ownership transparency. The Euromedia Ownership Monitor aims to (1) provide systematic information on the ownership and control of the main news media in the EU Member States, (2) identify what relevant information is missing, and (3) assess the risks to transparency of media ownership and control in each country.

Media ownership transparency and media ownership concentration has been a topic of policy research by the members of the Euromedia Research Group (EMRG, www.euromediagroup.org) since more than three decades. Over all these years of research it became clear that media concentration is a complex issue with no clear-cut implications. On the one hand, media ownership concentration in its various forms and formats contribute to strengthening the resilience of news media against all kinds of external influence – from politics, commercial customers and other powerful groups in society. Concentrated media conglomerates normally are stronger market actors. On the other hand, media ownership concentration constitutes an important risk to diversity and plurality in democratic countries, both in terms of market competition, and in terms of public opinion formation and the public sphere. High levels of media ownership concentration are incompatible with fundamental democratic norms and values.
As a consequence of these countervailing forces, media policy often appears paralysed, both at the national, and at the supranational level. The history of policy projects regarding media ownership concentration by the (then) European Community exemplifies this ambiguity. A small common denominator is the agreement that ownership transparency is helpful to balance some of the negative implications of ownership, as recent EU publications such as the “2020 Rules of Law Report” (2020) and the “Study on the implementation of the new provision in the revised audio-visual Media Services directive” (Deloitte and SMIT 2021) suggest. Furthermore, media ownership transparency is part of the “Media Pluralism Monitor” by the Centre for Media Pluralism and Media Freedom (CMPF) and the “Media Ownership Monitor” by Reporters without borders/Reporters sans frontiers.

Our approach to media ownership also starts from ownership transparency, but does not stop there. In our theoretical approach we suggest to widen the concept towards the framework of the principle-agent-theory, which allows to better understand the risks created by media ownership. By including the agent into the equation behavioural patterns become visible, which incur risks as well as opportunities.

For the pilot study “Euromedia Ownership Monitor” (EurOMo) we develop, design and feed a newly established databank for media ownership transparency and media ownership risks. This database, located in Finland, accommodates theory-based indicators in the dimensions of media supply, media distribution and the legal framework. It will remain operational beyond the end of the pilot project, it is scalable and can be used for future research and monitoring activities.

Photo by Joel Fulgencio on Unsplash
show more

Project Description

tbd

Project Information

Overview

Duration: 2021-2022

Research programme:
RP3 - Knowledge for the Media Society

Third party

EU Connect (2020)7319235-Pilot

Cooperation Partner

Prof. Josef Trappel, Universität Salzburg (Project lead)
Prof. Karin Raeymaeckers, University of Ghent – BELGIUM
Josef Slerka, Nadační fond nezávislé žurnalistiky (The Endowment for Independent Journalism) – CZECH REPUBLIC
Prof. Ida Willig, Roskilde University – DENMARK
Marko Ala-Fossi, Tampere University - FINLAND
Prof. Stylianos Papathanassopoulos, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens – GREECE
Prof. Peter Bajomi-Lázár, Budapest Business School - HUNGARY
Prof. Christian Ruggiero, La Sapienza University of Rome - ITALY
Prof. Aukse Balčytienė, Vytautas Magnus University – LITHUANIA
Prof. Leen d’Haenens, University of Leuven – BELGIUM
Prof. Elsa Costa e Silva, University of Minho – PORTUGAL
Jonas Ohlsson, University of Gothenburg – SWEDEN
Prof. Marko Milosavljević, University of Ljubljana – SLOVENIA
Prof. Ruth Rodríguez Martínez, Universitat Pompeu Fabra – SPAIN

Contact person

Prof. Dr. Barbara Thomaß
Senior Researcher

Prof. Dr. Barbara Thomaß

Leibniz-Institut für Medienforschung | Hans-Bredow-Institut
Rothenbaumchaussee 36
20148 Hamburg
Germany
 

Send Email

MAYBE YOU ARE ALSO INTERESTED IN THESE TOPICS?

Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter and receive the Institute's latest news via email.

SUBSCRIBE!