Which technical and social factors dominate on platforms? Which content enters public communication and the individual media repertoire, and if so, how? The project funded by the Volkswagen Foundation and located between media law and computer science, wants to make this visible with a new method (STEAM) and thus offer media regulation opportunities for new regulatory approaches.
Societal communication has changed profoundly in the wake of ongoing digitalisation, without media law instruments and approaches having sufficiently adapted to this. In view of new compositions of actors and the use of algorithmic systems and other technologies, new approaches to media regulation are required. While the ideal of maintaining media diversity has been the primary concern so far, it is now no longer scarce channels but new systems and actors embedded in them that determine whether and how a certain content of public communication reaches an individual's media repertoire.
This project aims at establishing a Socio-Technical Ecosystem Architecture Method (STEAM) that builds on existing architecture-based approaches as well as normative concepts and frameworks informed by legal and ethical expertise and horizon scanning approaches. It will enable an in-depth description and assessment of ecosystems, the actors embedded in them and the dynamic functions among them. The assessment seeks to identify novel threats to societal communication as well as suitable starting points for their regulatory counteraction.
Novel actors and technologies used by them, particularly related to artificial intelligence (AI), have gained relevance in the generation, aggregation, selection, curation, and prioritization of content. At the time a content item is displayed in an individual’s sphere of attention, numerous decisions are made beforehand that influence the content’s dissemination and the probability of ending up as part of the individual’s media repertoire. Specifically, various actors (e.g. content creators, digital platforms or content providers) involved in the entire process from content creation to content provision have influence on societal communication. In this relation, these actors also increasingly use algorithmic systems and, in particular, AI. Two examples illustrate this phenomenon:
- The first illustrative example is provided by Facebook and its news-aggregating application Facebook News. The platform is constituted by novel constellations of human, technical, and institutional actors and dynamics as well as interdependencies among them. Ultimately, human curators, together with recommendation and filtering algorithms, generate a selection of media contributions that are offered to the user. However, the pool of available contributions is already narrowed by various limiting factors in the broader environment. Facebook, together with external partners, selects media outlets that are admitted. Furthermore, Facebook determines publisher guidelines that publishers need to adhere to and monetization schemes that publishers need to agree to. Therefore, the media repertoire of a user of Facebook News is co-determined by a range of decisions made by various actors engaging on the platform.
- The second example considers the American social networking platform Parler, which is often discussed for user content involving far-right posts, antisemitism, and conspiracy theories. In January 2021, three companies exerted meaningful influence on the accessibility and usage of Parler. Both major mobile platform providers - Google and Apple - removed Parler from their respective app stores on iOS and Android. In addition, Amazon exerted meaningful influence by suspending Parler from its cloud hosting service Amazon Web Services (AWS). Through this intervention by Amazon, Parler was unable to operate its platform and had to go offline. The example emphasizes that oftentimes parties considered for diverse purposes, in this case, the distribution, operation, and general availability of an app, could exert influence on the media repertoire of individuals without prior judicial or regulatory decision to do so and without having been in the spotlight as important actors so far.
Both cases demonstrate challenges to pre-existing mechanisms for safeguarding societal communication and its essential functions. The cases might hint at concerns for relevant qualities of societal communication, which are not covered by the current communication law system. Therefore, we need to rethink fundamentally how we can ensure that communication systems fulfil their essential societal
To achieve the research objectives, we develop the Socio-Technical Ecosystem Architecture Method (STEAM) to enable a holistic view on news dissemination in ecosystems. This method will help in the presentation of ecosystems and their actors and relations in a way that forms the basis from a regulatory perspective to allow the assessment of actors and their behaviour regarding their impact on and consequences for communication recipients. This is a prerequisite for safeguarding societal communication and guaranteeing a functioning communication system in the future. To develop STEAM, we integrate architectural thinking and normative reasoning within three iterations of design science research (DSR).
The project is one of seven project consortia from the social and technical sciences funded by the Volkswagen Foundation with a total of 9.8 million euros. All selected projects are scheduled to run for three to four years and will each receive funding of around 1.5 million euros. Further information on the Volkswagen Foundation's initiative "Artificial Intelligence and the Society of the Future"
can be found at https://www.volkswagenstiftung.de/en/funding/our-funding-portfolio-at-a-glance/artificial-intelligence-and-the-society-of-the-future.
Photo by bert b