Element 68Element 45Element 44Element 63Element 64Element 43Element 41Element 46Element 47Element 69Element 76Element 62Element 61Element 81Element 82Element 50Element 52Element 79Element 79Element 7Element 8Element 73Element 74Element 17Element 16Element 75Element 13Element 12Element 14Element 15Element 31Element 32Element 59Element 58Element 71Element 70Element 88Element 88Element 56Element 57Element 54Element 55Element 18Element 20Element 23Element 65Element 21Element 22iconsiconsElement 83iconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsElement 84iconsiconsElement 36Element 35Element 1Element 27Element 28Element 30Element 29Element 24Element 25Element 2Element 1Element 66

Die Sozialpflichtigkeit der Herrschaft über Daten: Warum die EU die großen Plattformen regulieren kann

Die Sozialpflichtigkeit der Herrschaft über Daten: Warum die EU die großen Plattformen regulieren kann

In an interview for the Meinungsbarometer, Matthias C. Kettemann took a closer look at the EU regulation of large platforms.

To the interview (in German)
Abstract
"For a very long time, politics has stood by while platforms accumulated huge amounts of data. For far too long," says Dr. Matthias C. Kettemann of the Hans-Bredow-Institut. The researcher and expert on legal issues concerning the internet sees a good chance that major platforms will go along with EU regulation. When it comes to details, he can still imagine improvements to the planned regulations.


Kettemann, M. C. (2021): Die Sozialpflichtigkeit der Herrschaft über Daten: Warum die EU die großen Plattformen regulieren kann [The Social Responsibility of Data Governance: Why the EU Can Regulate Major Platforms]. In: Meinungsbarometer.info, 16.02.2021. https://www.meinungsbarometer.info/beitrag/Die-Sozialpflichtigkeit-der-Herrschaft-ueber-Daten_3944.html

Die Sozialpflichtigkeit der Herrschaft über Daten: Warum die EU die großen Plattformen regulieren kann

In an interview for the Meinungsbarometer, Matthias C. Kettemann took a closer look at the EU regulation of large platforms.

To the interview (in German)
Abstract
"For a very long time, politics has stood by while platforms accumulated huge amounts of data. For far too long," says Dr. Matthias C. Kettemann of the Hans-Bredow-Institut. The researcher and expert on legal issues concerning the internet sees a good chance that major platforms will go along with EU regulation. When it comes to details, he can still imagine improvements to the planned regulations.


Kettemann, M. C. (2021): Die Sozialpflichtigkeit der Herrschaft über Daten: Warum die EU die großen Plattformen regulieren kann [The Social Responsibility of Data Governance: Why the EU Can Regulate Major Platforms]. In: Meinungsbarometer.info, 16.02.2021. https://www.meinungsbarometer.info/beitrag/Die-Sozialpflichtigkeit-der-Herrschaft-ueber-Daten_3944.html

About this publication

Authors

Prof. Dr. Matthias C. Kettemann, LL.M. (Harvard)

Year of publication

2021

RELATED KEYWORDS

Internet regulation • European Union • Platform Regulation

Related projects and publications

Projects
Publications
All
CI_STEAM2_leibniz-Institut fuer Medienforschung_Hans-Bredow-Institut_fabio-unsplash.jpg

Volkswagen Foundation Funds Joint Project

STEAM – The Socio-Technical Ecosystem Architecture Method

Why do digital media feed us certain messages and not others? Which technical service providers and algorithms play a role when messages reach us? Which of these functions are socially acceptable and which, on the other hand, constitute manipulation? The project funded by the Volkswagen Foundation a...
CI_PlattformDemokratie_Leibniz-Institut-fuer-Medienforschung_Hans-Bredow-Institut_conny-schneider-3hkKv6WzjcE-unsplash.jpg

Project funded by Stiftung Mercator

Platform Councils as Tools to Democratize Hybrid Online Orders

How could "platform councils" or other institutions for integrating public interests into platform rule-making processes ensure that public interests and democratic values are taken into account? A new project is embarking on a search for global best practice models.
CI_Platform-Governance-Bundestagswahl-2021-Leibniz-Institut-fuer-Medienforschung-mika-baumeister-unsplash.jpg

Federal Election 2021

Platform Governance in the Super Election Year 2021

In the run-up to the 2021 federal election, a team from the HBI collected real-time data on how platforms govern online speech, how laws and local standards interact, and how platform practices changed in the shadow of EU regulation in the heated atmosphere of the run-up to the German federal electi...
PRObs_Leibniz-Institut-fuer-Medienforschung_Hans-Bredow-Institut_ravi-sharma-RnW1taVZqm8-unsplash.jpg

New International Project

Private Ordering Observatory

In order to study how online platforms decide what can be said online, the Leibniz Institute for Media Research sets up a "Private Ordering Observatory".  

CI_BKM-EU_Medienkonferenz_Leibniz-Institut-fuer-Medienforschung_Hans-Bredow-Institut.jpg

Conference within the Framework of the German EU Council Presidency

Coherent Media Order: Accompanying the EU Media Conference 2020

The institute will provide scientific support for the media conference in the context of Germany's 2020 EU Council Presidency and is analysing in advance the requirements of a modern European information order.
CI_PlatformDemocracyReportCover.jpg

Project Findings

Perspectives on Platform Power, Public Values and the Potential of Social Media Councils

In the final report of the research project "Platform://Democracy", project leaders Prof. Dr. Matthias C. Kettemann and Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Schulz present possibilities for a better protection of human rights and democratic values in the digital space. Based on research data...
CI_Amelie-Heldt_Intensivere-Drittwirkung.jpg

Dissertation Published

Intensivere Drittwirkung

In her dissertation thesis, Amélie Heldt asks whether information intermediaries such as social networks are or should be bound by freedom of expression when they moderate users' posts and comments. Based on a constitutional, comparative and interdisciplinary analysis, she advoc...
CI_Internet Policy review.png

Open Access!

Hybrid Institutions for Disinformation Governance. Between Imaginative and Imaginary

In this article, Martin Fertmann, Bharath Ganesh, Robert Gorwa and Lisa-Maria Neudert discuss the potential of new institutions for the governance of disinformation.   The article is one of a three-part series presenting important considerations on the governance of disinformation. All contribu...
CI_Internet Policy review.png

Open Access!

Between Evidence and Policy: Bridging the Gap in Disinformation Regulation

In this article, Pranav Manjesh Bidare, Dr. Stephan Dreyer and Dr. Clara Iglesias Keller discuss the empirical evidence for the governance of disinformation.The article is one of a three-part series presenting important considerations on the governance of disinformation. All...
CI_Internet Policy review.png

Open Access!

Truth, Intention and Harm. Conceptual Challenges for Disinformation-targeted Governance

In this article, Naomi Appelman, Dr. Stephan Dreyer, Pranav Manjesh Bidare and Keno C. Potthast discuss the conceptual challenges in the context of disinformation governance. In doing so, they show why the current focus on truth/falsehood and intention bear both ri...
show more

Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter and receive the Institute's latest news via email.

SUBSCRIBE!