Element 68Element 45Element 44Element 63Element 64Element 43Element 41Element 46Element 47Element 69Element 76Element 62Element 61Element 81Element 82Element 50Element 52Element 79Element 79Element 7Element 8Element 73Element 74Element 17Element 16Element 75Element 13Element 12Element 14Element 15Element 31Element 32Element 59Element 58Element 71Element 70Element 88Element 88Element 56Element 57Element 54Element 55Element 18Element 20Element 23Element 65Element 21Element 22iconsiconsElement 83iconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsiconsElement 84iconsiconsElement 36Element 35Element 1Element 27Element 28Element 30Element 29Element 24Element 25Element 2Element 1Element 66

Künstliche Intelligenz als Richter

Künstliche Intelligenz als Richter

Dr. Stephan Dreyer and Johannes Schmees examine the challenges and problems that arise in the automation of complex (state) decisions in their article in Computer und Recht using the example of court decisions. They argue for a reasonable consideration of the algorithmisation of legal processes in view of the fundamental hurdles that the weighing of individual legal processes as well as value judgements and their processing in the texts of the verdicts pose.
 
The article was published in issue 11/2019 of the journal Computer und Recht.
 
Dreyer, S.; Schmees, J.; (2019): Künstliche Intelligenz als Richter [Artificial Intelligence as a Judge]. In: CR 2019, pp. 758-764.
 
You can order the issue here.

Künstliche Intelligenz als Richter

Dr. Stephan Dreyer and Johannes Schmees examine the challenges and problems that arise in the automation of complex (state) decisions in their article in Computer und Recht using the example of court decisions. They argue for a reasonable consideration of the algorithmisation of legal processes in view of the fundamental hurdles that the weighing of individual legal processes as well as value judgements and their processing in the texts of the verdicts pose.
 
The article was published in issue 11/2019 of the journal Computer und Recht.
 
Dreyer, S.; Schmees, J.; (2019): Künstliche Intelligenz als Richter [Artificial Intelligence as a Judge]. In: CR 2019, pp. 758-764.
 
You can order the issue here.

About this publication

Authors

Dr. Johannes Schmees • Dr. Stephan Dreyer

Year of publication

2019

RELATED KEYWORDS

algorithms • artificial intelligence • Automated Decision Making Systems

Related projects and publications

Projects
Publications
All
CI2_BIDTCodingPublicValue_Leibniz-Institut-fuer-Medienforschung_Hans-Bredow-Institut.jpg

New Cooperation Project

Coding Public Value

How can we develop software that is not only oriented towards business models, but also towards the common good, user interests, and media regulation? Coding Public Value (CPV) translates questions on media law, user orientation, and the integration of political and social stakeholders into approach...
CI_VWArtificialIntelligence_Hans-Bredow-Institut.jpg

Interdisciplinary VolkswagenStiftung Project

Opportunities and Limitations of ADM Systems

The interdisciplinary basic research project examines the opportunities and limitations of algorithmic decision making systems by using the example of their use in criminal justice systems.
17-11AlgorithmischesEnscheiden_Hans-Bredow-Institut.png

White Paper for Central German Broadcasting

Algorithmic Recommendations

To what extent can algorithmic recommendation systems be part of the own journalistic activity of public service media providers and take the side of (or take the place of) journalistic selection and compilation of information? In a White Paper for the MDR (Central German Broadcasting), the main cha...
Algorithmen-2_Hans-Bredow-Institut.png

Report for the German Bundestag

Algorithms and Opinion Formation

The Office of Technology Assessment at the German Bundestag (TAB) commissioned the Hans-Bredow-Institut with a report on the topic of "Algorithms in Digital Media and Their Influence on Individual Opinion Formation of Users".  
Algorithmen-4_Hans-Bredow-Institut.png

Postdoc Research Network

Algorithmed Public Spheres

How can we better understand the inner workings of algorithms and their significance for us individually and as a society? The network Algorithmed Public Spheres invites international researchers from different fields to address this question.  
CI_Human-Machine-Communication.jpg

ChatGPT, LaMDA, and the Hype Around Communicative AI

The Automation of Communication as a Field of Research in Media and Communication Studies

This article aims to define the research field of "automated communication" more clearly and recommends that we should broaden our view in order to better understand the current changes in the media environment. Instead of focusing on human-machine interaction alone, social communication s...
CI_Mast_Morals+Machines Kopie.jpg

Neu erschienen

Some Black Boxes are Made of Flesh; Others are Made of Silicon

Tobias Mast's article "Some Black Boxes are made of Flesh; Others are made of Silicon" appeared in issue 2/2023 of the journal Morals & Machines. Automated decisions, especially those that work with AI, are accused of being opaque black boxes. In this article, Tobias Mast argues t...
CI_Transparency-or-Opacity_Tobias-Mast.jpg

Book Chapter

Zum Wesensunterschied menschlicher und maschineller Entscheidungsbegründung aus rechtssoziologischer Perspektive

In his contribution to the anthology "Transparency or Opacity", Dr Tobias Mast looks at the advantages and disadvantages of automated decision-making from the perspective of the sociology of law. The contribution and the entire anthology are available as an open access volum...
CI_Transparency-or-Opacity.jpg

Editorship

Transparency or Opacity

Martin Fertmann, together with Simone Kuhlmann, Fabrizio De Gregorio, Hannah Ofterdinger and Anton Sefkow, has published an anthology with contributions from legal scholars on the problem of transparency in automated decision-making processes. The anthology is available as an open access publicatio...
CI_NMS_Kettemann et al.jpg

Open Access available

Not All Who Are Bots Are Evil

In their article in new media & society, the authors examine how bots are regulated on 9 platforms and develop an analytical scheme to develop a generalisable normative framework for agent governance. Makhortykh, Mykola; Urman, Aleksandra; Münch, Felix Victor; Heldt, Amélie; Dreye...
show more

Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter and receive the Institute's latest news via email.

SUBSCRIBE!