{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Leibniz Institut f\u00fcr Medienforschung | Leibniz Institute for Media Research","provider_url":"https:\/\/leibniz-hbi.de\/en\/","title":"Federal Administrative Court on \u201cCompact\u201d","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"1QAA85jW0o\"><a href=\"https:\/\/leibniz-hbi.de\/en\/hbi-news\/news\/federal-administrative-court-on-compact\/\">Federal Administrative Court on \u201cCompact\u201d<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/leibniz-hbi.de\/en\/hbi-news\/news\/federal-administrative-court-on-compact\/embed\/#?secret=1QAA85jW0o\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"&#8220;Federal Administrative Court on \u201cCompact\u201d&#8221; &#8212; Leibniz Institut f\u00fcr Medienforschung | Leibniz Institute for Media Research\" data-secret=\"1QAA85jW0o\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/\/# sourceURL=https:\/\/leibniz-hbi.de\/wp-includes\/js\/wp-embed.min.js\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/leibniz-hbi.de\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/Wolfgang-Schulz-Header.jpg","thumbnail_width":1380,"thumbnail_height":400,"description":"In his guest commentary on Legal Tribune Online (LTO) on 22 August 2024, Wolfgang Schulz explains the \u201cdelicate balancing act\u201d between protecting the rule of law and ensuring the freedoms guaranteed by fundamental rights, which the decision of the Federal Administrative Court of 14 August 2024 regarding the so-called \u201cCompact\u201d ban has achieved. The constitutional [&hellip;]"}