Repository for Policy Documents

The establishment of a repository, which exclusively comprises publications on scientific consulting on politics and society from the entire German scientific system, is intended to create a targeted information and consulting infrastructure for actors from politics, administration and other areas of society. The Leibniz Institute for Media Research is supporting the development by conducting accompanying scientific research into the process of generating and using documents on political and social consulting.

Science-led policy advice has gained enormously in importance in recent years and has continually become more diverse. Political decisions are increasingly based on empirical research results and expert opinions. However, searching for advisory documents can be tedious and time-consuming, as they are scattered on various websites and often cannot be searched for specifically. For this reason, the “Repository for Policy Documents” (REPOD) is now being launched supported by the Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF).

With REPOD, a digital repository is being established that makes advisory documents searchable across disciplines in a targeted manner and which ensures uniform quality assurance. The goal is to create an information and advisory infrastructure by the end of 2023 that will make the transfer of knowledge from research to politics and society much easier.

Led by the ZBW – Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, the research consortium consists of scientists from the Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society (HIIG), the Leibniz Institute for Media Research | Hans-Bredow-Institut (HBI), the Leibniz Institute for Research on Society and Space (IRS),  and the RWI – Leibniz Institute for Economic Research, The Leibniz Association is involved as an associated partner.

Using Documents for Policy and Societal Advice

The Leibniz Institute for Media Research | Hans-Bredow-Institut (HBI) takes over part of the scientific accompanying research in REPOD. In close cooperation with the Leibniz Institute for Research on Society and Space (IRS), the processes for the production and use of scientific advisory documents are being researched. These processes involve a heterogeneous group of actors from science, politics, administration, media, and civil society. While the HBI examines the perspectives of the producers, the IRS focuses on the users of such advisory documents.

To gain practical insights into the identification of topics, the selection and translation of knowledge, and the dissemination and evaluation of advisory documents, the HBI uses qualitative methods such as ethnographic observations, retrospective interviews and content analyses. In this way, a multitude of actors, their practices and goal orientations are captured in the different steps involved in the production of scientific advisory documents. To map the entire processes of action and communication around such documents, these findings are mirrored by the results of the user perspective analysed by the IRS. Concrete suggestions for the development of scientific advisory documents and the design of the repository, such as matchmaking, search, and mapping functions as well as reputation mechanisms, are derived from the identified practices, challenges and opportunities (cf. Berr et al. 2022).

How Can Policy Papers Be Found?

Scientific advice to politics and society has steadily gained in importance in Germany. More and more non-university research institutions, universities, colleges, academies, etc. see science-based advice to politics and society as their task. The field is dominated by policy papers, expert reports, and studies that are oriented towards a social problem, present and contextualize the state of scientific knowledge in a generally understandable language and point out options for action.

The central problem addressed by the project “Repository for Policy Documents (REPOD)” is the ability to find and access these documents. By setting up a repository that exclusively comprises publications of scientific policy and societal advice from the entire German science system, a targeted information and advice infrastructure is created for actors from politics, administration, and other areas of society.

Existing data and literature resources will be made accessible, searchable, and findable across disciplines (work package 1). For this purpose, a cloud-based information infrastructure will be established (work package 2). The accompanying scientific research (work package 3) uses stakeholder workshops and interviews with scientific actors from various disciplines as well as actors from politics, administration, the media and social institutions to develop approaches to quality assurance and criteria for the use of scientific advisory documents as well as the repository (work package 3.1). The HBI will use qualitative methods to gain insights into the challenges and needs of the actors involved in the process from the creation to the use of the advisory document as an important instrument of scientific policy advice (work package 3.2). This is accompanied by interactive exchange formats as well as marketing and communication campaigns (work package 4).

Logo sponsored Federal Ministry of Education and Research
Photo by Christa Dodoo on Unsplash

Project details

Overview

Start of the term: 2023; End of term: 2024

Research programme: RP 3 Knowledge for the Media Society

Contact person

Hans-Ulrich Wagner

Dr. Hans-Ulrich Wagner

Senior Researcher Media History

Research Centre Media History
Leibniz Institute for Media Research | Hans-Bredow-Institut (HBI)
Rothenbaumchaussee 36
20148 Hamburg
Germany

Similar projects & publications

Cover of the Handbook Media and Communication Governance
Publikation accessible open access

Private Ordering of Media

In a handbook article, Tobias Mast, Matthias C. Kettemann and Wolfgang Schulz address the question of how media organizations and platform operators setprivate law through, for example, their terms and conditions.

Symbolbild von rotunde

Coding Public Value

How can we develop software that is not only oriented towards business models, but also towards the common good, user interests, and media regulation? Coding Public Value (CPV) translates questions on media law into approaches and methods for a responsible software engineering.

Auf einem weißen Schreitisch liegen Tastatur, Handy und ein Kameraobjektiv
Projekt Pilot Project Computational Social Science

Journalistic Use of Information Environments Influenced by Algorithms

The pilot project in the field of computational social science used browser data donations to investigate how relevant the offerings of individual search engines and social media are in the everyday work of journalists.

Wandbild von Menschen mit Gepäck und Schriftzug "Made in Crisis"
Projekt BMBF Project

Communication in Times of Crisis

How do communications change in a crisis like the COVID-19 pandemic? What role do actors from science, politics and the media take over? How do they deal with uncertainty from this situation? A project that reviewed existing studies and interviewed experts provided answers to this question.

Digitaler ahmmer au
Projekt Funded by Stiftung Mercator

Platform Democracy

How could "platform councils" or other institutions for integrating public interests into platform rule-making processes ensure that public interests and democratic values are taken into account? A new project is embarking on a search for global best practice models.

Mann auf Rolltreppe
Projekt BMBF Project

Media and Science Communication

How do scientific findings about journalistic media and social media get into the world? What criteria do science editors use to select topics? And what impact can scientific content have with it?

Blick vom Weltraum auf die nächtliche Erde mit Lichtspots
Projekt International Cooperation Project

Global Media and Internet Concentration

The international Global Media & Internet Concentration Project (GMICP) analyses communication, internet and media markets in nearly 40 countries. The HBI is responsible for collecting and reporting the data for Germany.

KI-generiertes Bild einer Schaufensterpuppe in sonniger Einkaufsstraße mit Passant*innen
Projekt Expert Opinion for the KJM

Labeling of Edited (Influencer) Photos

Must, should, may digitally edited photos in social media be labeled? On behalf of the Commission for the Protection of Minors in the Media (KJM), the HBI is investigating the necessity of a legal labeling requirement for edited photos and videos.

Buchcover "Sozialer Zusammenhalt vor Ort"
Publikation From the Research Institute Social Cohesion

Social Cohesion on the Ground

A new volume in the publication series of the Research Institute Social Cohesion (RISC) presents articles on the topic of "Local Social Cohesion". This includes an article by Jan-Hindrik Schmidt and Hannah Immler, both researchers at the FGZ's Hamburg site at the HBI, on Local Media Repertoires and Cohesion-Related Attitudes.

Cover of the Working Paper Trust in News Sources
Publikation Working Paper No. 71 Available for Download

Trust in Established News Sources

In Germany, trust in established news sources can best be explained by age: Older internet users tend to place more trust in the news than younger ones.

1 2 3 6

Page 1 from 6

Newsletter

Information about current projects, events and publications of the institute.

Subscribe now