Journalism: The Automation of News and Journalistic Autonomy

What does the use of communicative AI mean for journalism? The project, which is part of the DFG research group “Communicative AI (ComAI) – The Automation of Societal Communication”, examines communicative AI in journalism by analysing the challenges it poses to journalistic autonomy at the interaction, organisational and societal levels.

The research is based on the assumption that human-machine relationships and social communication in journalism are in a special relationship and that this is also relevant for journalistic self-reflection and forms of appropriation of communicative AI in journalism. The project, led by Prof. Dr. Wiebke Loosen, is guided by four questions

  1. How do journalists and other professional actors in journalism interact with communicative AI and how do they construct agency?
  2. What patterns of embedding communicative AI in journalistic organisations can be identified and what forms of hybrid agency emerge?
  3. How does communicative AI relate to notions of news and objectivity, journalistic roles and audience relations, and what are the imaginaries of future developments of communicative AI in journalism?
  4. How does the use of communicative AI in journalism challenge journalistic autonomy?

These questions will be addressed using a multi-method design consisting of ethnographies in different types of media organisations in Germany, Austria and the UK, as well as interviews, group discussions and ethnographies at events.

About the Overall Project

The project is part of the overall project “Communicative AI (ComAI) – The Automation of Social Communication“. The research group of the German Research Foundation (DFG) is investigating the consequences, risks, but also the potentials of the profound change in the media environment brought about by communicative artificial intelligence (AI). In addition to the HBI (Prof. Dr. Wiebke Loosen) and the ZeMKI (Prof. Dr. Andreas Hepp), which coordinate the research group, the University of Vienna and the University of Graz are also involved.

A total of nine research projects and one coordination project are investigating how social communication changes when communicative AI becomes part of it. The project brings together leading researchers from the fields of communication and media studies, human-computer interaction, sociology of knowledge, governance research and media law. They are united by the goal of systematically analysing the transformation of social communication under the influence of artificial intelligence by studying the consequences of its use in different social areas and the social discourse about it.

The research will focus on social pioneers, the development of interfaces, the legal and corporate handling of communicative AI, its role in journalism, in public (online) discourse, in personal everyday life through technological companions, in the health sector, and in learning and teaching.

A shared research environment for the participating institutions will be set up for the research group in order to increase the visibility of the research group’s findings for decision-makers in various areas of society across all locations. This will be accompanied by the central task of identifying possible future scenarios for the dissemination and impact assessment of automation processes at different levels of social communication.

Subprojects at the HBI

In addition to the project “Journalism: Automation of News and Journalistic Autonomy”, two other projects are being carried out at the HBI:

  1. The Juridification of Communicative Artificial Intelligence: The project, led by Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Schulz, investigates the juridification of communicative AI. The focus is on the legal framework for communicative bots (in particular ChatGPT) and social bots (in particular X and Facebook) – on the one hand from the perspective of communication law, and on the other hand from the perspective of emerging AI regulation.
  2. Political Discourse: Communicative AI and Deliberative Quality: The project, led by Prof. Dr. Cornelius Puschmann and Dr. Gregor Wiedemann, investigates communicative AI in the social domain of political discourse using discourse monitoring and discourse intervention. With a largely experimental approach, the effects of social bots using Large Language Models (LLMs) on the quality of deliberation are examined. German-language debates on climate change on X, Mastodon and Bluesky serve as case studies.

Further information

Further information on the project can be found on the project website https://comai.space/.

Project details

Overview

Start of the term: 2025; End of term: 2028

Research programme: RP 1 Transformation of Public Communication

Third-party funder

German Research Foundation

Contact person

Wiebke Loosen

Prof. Dr. Wiebke Loosen

Senior Researcher Journalism Research

We are no longer located at Rothenbaumchaussee 36. You can reach us temporarely at the following address:

Leibniz Institute for Media Research, Hans-Bredow-Institut
c/o betahaus | Gänsemarkt
Gänsemarkt 43
20354 Hamburg

Similar projects & publications

Screenshot of the article by Dr. Gregor Wiedemann, AVISO, issue no. 81 (Fall 2025)
Publikation Article in aviso I Informationsdienst der DGPuK

AI and Research: Harnessing Potential, Understanding Risks

In his contribution, Gregor Wiedemann highlights the ambivalences that can arise from the use of AI tools in communication science research processes, as well as the necessity of precise risk assessment in this context.

Screenshot of an article on the Verfassungsblog. Title of the article: “Ein rundfunkrechtliches ‘Solange’?” [An “As Long As" in Broadcasting Law?]
Publikation Article on Verfassungsblog

An “As Long As” in Broadcasting Law?

In an article, Dr. Tobias Mast and Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Schulz discuss the Federal Constitutional Court's decision on the constitutionality of the broadcasting license fee. Their analysis is based on the press release published by the Federal Administrative Court on October 15, 2025.

Cover of an expert opinion by Dr. Stephan Dreyer on the AI Regulation and children's rights
Publikation German Children's Fund

Expert Opinion on Children’s Rights and Artificial Intelligence (AI)

In his expert opinion, "The AI Regulation, Its Relationship to Children’s Rights in the Digital Space, and Options for Advocacy Approaches," media lawyer Stephan Dreyer examines how the children’s rights enshrined in the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights are addressed in the regulation.

Einige futuristische Stühle stehen im Kreis auf einer grünen Wiese

Dialogue Formats in Public Service Media

What contribution can public service media make in the digital age as a platform for social dialogue? This future workshop will use scientific methods to develop scenarios and strategies for sustainable dialogue formats in digitalised societies.

Screenshot of the website diskursmonitor, entry “Social Bots” by Gregor Wiedemann
Publikation Online Portal for Strategic Communication

Glossary Entry on “Social Bots”

Dr. Gregor Wiedemann wrote a glossary entry on “social bots” for Diskursmonitor, a collaborative online platform that aims to educate and document strategic communication. This topic is marked by major controversy in academia, some of which has played out in public.

Cover of the M&K journal, issue 3/2025
Publikation M&K 3/2025 as Special Issue

Diversity, Intersectionality, and Gender in Journalism

The third issue of M&K in 2025 is a special edition on "Diversity, Intersectionality, and Gender in Journalism," edited by Margreth Lünenborg, Ana-Nzinga Weiß, Yener Bayramoğlu, and Bernadette Uth. The nine articles are available open access on the Nomos eLibrary.

Cover of an article by Judith Möller et al. in the journal
Publikation Article in Journal of Communication

Positioning and Presentation of Articles in News Aggregators

In the study “Nudges for News Recommenders,” Dr. Nicolas Mattis, Lucien Heitz, Dr. Philipp K. Masur, Prof. Dr. Judith Möller, and Prof. Dr. Wouter van Atteveldt examine how the placement and presentation of environmental news in news aggregators can influence user behavior.

Cover of the Oxford Handbook
Publikation Digital Orders of the Future

Digital Constitutionalism Rethought

In a chapter of the Oxford Handbook of Digital Constitutionalism, Matthias C. Kettemann and Anna Sophia Tiedeke explore digital constitutionalism from the perspective of various normativities. These are the diverse rules, values, and organizing principles that shape the digital space.

Eine hübsche junge Familie aus Vater, Mutter Kind blicken strahlend in die Kamera, im Vordergrund links ein Ringlicht
Projekt Project for State Media Authorities

Babies and Toddlers as Family Influencers

The HBI is conducting a qualitative and quantitative study to examine how babies and young children under the age of five are portrayed on commercial German-language 'family influencing' profiles on Instagram, TikTok and YouTube. A team led by Dr. Claudia Lampert and Dr. Stephan Dreyer is discussing the findings in relation to the existing legal framework and media ethics considerations.

Cover des Buchs "Recht der Digitalisierung"
Publikation Available Open Access

Law of Digitalization

Can the right legal framework meet the central challenges of digitization? This volume, edited by Prof. Dr. Matthias C. Kettemann, explores important new areas of law, the regulation of AI, the role of digital services, and the characteristics of effective technology policy and sensible innovation law.

1 2 3 11

Page 1 from 11

Newsletter

Information about current projects, events and publications of the institute.

Subscribe now