Valorising the Past: Practices of Appropriating the Past

Various actors negotiate the past and make it relevant for the present in new communicative practices. The Research Lab “Practices of Appropriation” takes a closer look at historical memes and TikTok videos as well as historical Instagram and Twitter accounts.

Within the framework of the Leibniz research alliance “Value of the Past”, Research Lab 3.2 “Practices of Appropriation” explores new communicative practices of appropriating the past that can be observed against the backdrop of media change. The projects and networks examine the negotiation processes of history and the past in the public sphere or in partial public spheres with regard to which historical events and topics are declared relevant to the present by different actors.

We will explore the extent to which the multiplication of communicative spaces in which the past is discussed challenges previously valid monopolies of interpretation and creates new ones. In times when people co-produce their historical knowledge with recourse to a broad spectrum of different media, from the feuilleton of transnationally received newspapers to TikTok videos to Hitler and Holocaust memes, consensus in the culture of memory is becoming increasingly difficult. Due to the worldwide availability of communication services and media representations, especially nation-state societies are experiencing a surge of heterogenisation.

These dynamics are examined within the Lab’s work in various fields of action. For example, historical-political interventions and media strategies of populist and new-right actors will be analysed. The focus continues to be on remembrance practices in history classes, in which members of different generations meet with different media repertoires or the debate about rituals of remembrance in memorials as well as on anniversaries and new forms of historical narration in interactive digital media.

The Leibniz Institute for Media Research | Hans-Bredow-Institut (HBI) is a full member of the Leibniz research alliance “Value of the Past”Dr. Hans-Ulrich Wagner coordinates together with Dr. habil. Barbara Christophe from the Leibniz Institute for Educational Media | Georg Eckert Institute (GEI) the Research Lab 3.2 “Practices of Appropriation” within the research network.

Past on Social Media

As a small case study of a current social media memory project, Daria Chepurko, Ken Phan, Kira Thiel and Dr. Hans-Ulrich Wagner examined the Instagram account “@ichbinsophiescholl“. Offered by the public broadcasters Südwestrundfunk (SWR) and Bayerischer Rundfunk (BR) this account claims to offer an honest and an intimate perspective on the young resistance fighter Sophie Scholl during the Third Reich by having her appear as a present-day social media actor. The results of the research are summarized in the blog dossier Sophie Scholl auf Instagram: Eine kommunikations- und geschichtswissenschaftliche Untersuchung [Sophie Scholl on Instagram: A Communication and Historical Study] published on the Media Research Blog of the HBI.

Photo (from the Amsterdam Rijksmuseum): Hans-Ulrich Wagner

Project details

Overview

Start of the term: 2021; End of term: 2026

Persons involved

Third-party funder

Leibniz Association

Contact person

Hans-Ulrich Wagner

Dr. Hans-Ulrich Wagner

Senior Researcher Media History

Research Centre Media History
Leibniz Institute for Media Research | Hans-Bredow-Institut (HBI)
Rothenbaumchaussee 36
20148 Hamburg
Germany

Similar projects & publications

Cover of the first volume of the EU publication series

The Protection of Freedom of Expression in the Digital Services Act

The publication "Der Schutz der Meinungsäusserungsfreiheit im Digital Services Act" [The Protection of Freedom of Expression in the Digital Services Act], to which Matthias C. Kettemann contributed significantly, is the first in a series of KommAustria publications on the DSA, which are intended to provide a basis for understanding the DSA and contribute to a more differentiated discussion.

Cover of Working Paper No. 76
Publikation Project Findings Available for Download

Between Curiosity and Skepticism: Use and Perception of Generative AI for Information Search in Germany

The research project "Generative Artificial Intelligence for Information Navigation", funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF), investigated to what extent, for what purposes and for what reasons the German population uses generative artificial intelligence in applications such as ChatGPT or Google Gemini. The findings can be downloaded as a working paper.

Cover of the 6/2025 issue of the New Journal of Administrative Law.
Publikation Article in Journal for Administrative Law

Trusted Flaggers Are Not Authorized Agents!

In the current issue of the Neue Zeitschrift für Verwaltungsrecht, Tobias Mast challenges the increasingly prominent view in legal literature that trusted flaggers under Art. 22 of the Digital Services Act (DSA) are public authorities in the sense of German administrative law.

Cover of the Publication
Publikation Education Study in Media Perspektiven

The Population’s View of ZDF’s Educational Function

A study on the educational mandate of the ZDF has for the first time examined the population's educational expectations and perceptions. Jan-Hinrik Schmidt, Uwe Hasebrink and Dieter Storll were involved in an advisory capacity in the design and evaluation of the study and have presented the core findings in detail in an article.

Auf schwarz-weißem Schachbrett stehen sich weiße und schwarze Figuren gegenüber
Projekt DAAD cooperation project

Mapping Polarization in News Media Content

How are polarizing topics reported in Germany and Australia – and does this reporting contribute to the polarization of political attitudes? The project examines how news content in both countries differs in its coverage of controversial issues – and whether this reporting contains potentially polarizing elements.

Cover of the Handbook Digital Journalism
Publikation Recently Published

Handbook of Digital Journalism

The second edition of the Routledge Companion to Digital Journalism Studies offers a collection of 54 essays addressing current issues and debates in the field of digital journalism studies, including two articles by Julius Reimer / Wiebke Loosen and Lisa Merten.

Cover von Heft 1/2025 der Zeitschrift M&K
Publikation Available Open Access

Issue 1/2025 of M&K Published

Issue 1/2025 of our journal Media & Communication Studies (M&K) has been published, including articles on journalism in Germany in 2023, on the role of Google and YouTube in the dissemination of conspiracy theories, and on journalistic role expectations and ideals of social coexistence in the German population. All content can be downloaded for free from the Nomos eLibrary.

Cover of the journal Computational Communication Research
Publikation Open Access Article

Data Donations from Journalism

In their article “I Really Thought I Would Use More Than Just Google: Investigating Professional Journalistic Online Use with Browser History Donations”, Lisa Merten, Felix Victor Münch and Maren Schuster describe how the method of data donation can be used to investigate professional media use in journalism. The article was published in the open access journal Computational Communication Research.

Cover des Nomos-Handbuchs Journalismusforschung
Publikation Recently Published

Journalism Research

A new Nomos Handbook, edited by Thomas Hanitzsch, Wiebke Loosen and Annika Sehl, offers an insight into the diversity of research on journalism in its social context. It looks, among other things, at actors, organisations and institutions, as well as at news, how it is produced and how it is used. The volume reflects the thematic, theoretical and methodological diversity of research.

Portrait Jan-Ole Harfst
Publikation Blog Post on Verfassungsblog

Elections in a Fortified Platform Democracy

The integrity of the German parliamentary elections and future European elections has been and continues to be threatened by influence peddling via social networks. The Digital Services Act (DSA) is supposed to provide a remedy against election manipulation. In a blog post on the Verfassungsblog, Jan-Ole Harfst explains why Art. 34-35 of the DSA could hardly remedy the systemic risks of this federal election campaign.

1 2 3 8

Page 1 from 8

Newsletter

Information about current projects, events and publications of the institute.

Subscribe now