Repository for Policy Documents

The establishment of a repository, which exclusively comprises publications on scientific consulting on politics and society from the entire German scientific system, is intended to create a targeted information and consulting infrastructure for actors from politics, administration and other areas of society. The Leibniz Institute for Media Research is supporting the development by conducting accompanying scientific research into the process of generating and using documents on political and social consulting.

Science-led policy advice has gained enormously in importance in recent years and has continually become more diverse. Political decisions are increasingly based on empirical research results and expert opinions. However, searching for advisory documents can be tedious and time-consuming, as they are scattered on various websites and often cannot be searched for specifically. For this reason, the “Repository for Policy Documents” (REPOD) is now being launched supported by the Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF).

With REPOD, a digital repository is being established that makes advisory documents searchable across disciplines in a targeted manner and which ensures uniform quality assurance. The goal is to create an information and advisory infrastructure by the end of 2023 that will make the transfer of knowledge from research to politics and society much easier.

Led by the ZBW – Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, the research consortium consists of scientists from the Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society (HIIG), the Leibniz Institute for Media Research | Hans-Bredow-Institut (HBI), the Leibniz Institute for Research on Society and Space (IRS),  and the RWI – Leibniz Institute for Economic Research, The Leibniz Association is involved as an associated partner.

Using Documents for Policy and Societal Advice

The Leibniz Institute for Media Research | Hans-Bredow-Institut (HBI) takes over part of the scientific accompanying research in REPOD. In close cooperation with the Leibniz Institute for Research on Society and Space (IRS), the processes for the production and use of scientific advisory documents are being researched. These processes involve a heterogeneous group of actors from science, politics, administration, media, and civil society. While the HBI examines the perspectives of the producers, the IRS focuses on the users of such advisory documents.

To gain practical insights into the identification of topics, the selection and translation of knowledge, and the dissemination and evaluation of advisory documents, the HBI uses qualitative methods such as ethnographic observations, retrospective interviews and content analyses. In this way, a multitude of actors, their practices and goal orientations are captured in the different steps involved in the production of scientific advisory documents. To map the entire processes of action and communication around such documents, these findings are mirrored by the results of the user perspective analysed by the IRS. Concrete suggestions for the development of scientific advisory documents and the design of the repository, such as matchmaking, search, and mapping functions as well as reputation mechanisms, are derived from the identified practices, challenges and opportunities (cf. Berr et al. 2022).

How Can Policy Papers Be Found?

Scientific advice to politics and society has steadily gained in importance in Germany. More and more non-university research institutions, universities, colleges, academies, etc. see science-based advice to politics and society as their task. The field is dominated by policy papers, expert reports, and studies that are oriented towards a social problem, present and contextualize the state of scientific knowledge in a generally understandable language and point out options for action.

The central problem addressed by the project “Repository for Policy Documents (REPOD)” is the ability to find and access these documents. By setting up a repository that exclusively comprises publications of scientific policy and societal advice from the entire German science system, a targeted information and advice infrastructure is created for actors from politics, administration, and other areas of society.

Existing data and literature resources will be made accessible, searchable, and findable across disciplines (work package 1). For this purpose, a cloud-based information infrastructure will be established (work package 2). The accompanying scientific research (work package 3) uses stakeholder workshops and interviews with scientific actors from various disciplines as well as actors from politics, administration, the media and social institutions to develop approaches to quality assurance and criteria for the use of scientific advisory documents as well as the repository (work package 3.1). The HBI will use qualitative methods to gain insights into the challenges and needs of the actors involved in the process from the creation to the use of the advisory document as an important instrument of scientific policy advice (work package 3.2). This is accompanied by interactive exchange formats as well as marketing and communication campaigns (work package 4).

Logo sponsored Federal Ministry of Education and Research
Photo by Christa Dodoo on Unsplash

Project details

Overview

Start of the term: 2023; End of term: 2024

Research programme: RP 3 Knowledge for the Media Society

Contact person

Hans-Ulrich Wagner

Dr. Hans-Ulrich Wagner

Senior Researcher Media History

Research Centre Media History
Leibniz Institute for Media Research | Hans-Bredow-Institut (HBI)
Rothenbaumchaussee 36
20148 Hamburg
Germany

Similar projects & publications

Cover von Heft 1/2025 der Zeitschrift M&K
Publikation Available Open Access

Issue 1/2025 of M&K Published

Issue 1/2025 of our journal Media & Communication Studies (M&K) has been published, including articles on journalism in Germany in 2023, on the role of Google and YouTube in the dissemination of conspiracy theories, and on journalistic role expectations and ideals of social coexistence in the German population. All content can be downloaded for free from the Nomos eLibrary.

Cover des Nomos-Handbuchs Journalismusforschung
Publikation Recently Published

Journalism Research

A new Nomos Handbook, edited by Thomas Hanitzsch, Wiebke Loosen and Annika Sehl, offers an insight into the diversity of research on journalism in its social context. It looks, among other things, at actors, organisations and institutions, as well as at news, how it is produced and how it is used. The volume reflects the thematic, theoretical and methodological diversity of research.

Portrait Jan-Ole Harfst
Publikation Blog Post on Verfassungsblog

Elections in a Fortified Platform Democracy

The integrity of the German parliamentary elections and future European elections has been and continues to be threatened by influence peddling via social networks. The Digital Services Act (DSA) is supposed to provide a remedy against election manipulation. In a blog post on the Verfassungsblog, Jan-Ole Harfst explains why Art. 34-35 of the DSA could hardly remedy the systemic risks of this federal election campaign.

Cover der Zeitschrift "Youth and Society" Ausg. 1/2025
Publikation Article in the Journal Youth & Society

Information and Political Engagement Practices of Disadvantaged Youth

In the study “Disinterested and Disillusioned? Information and Political Engagement Practices of Young People from Disadvantaged Backgrounds”, the information and participation practices of young people with a low level of formal education are examined.

Cover of Working Paper No. 75
Publikation Working Paper Available for Download

Labeling of Edited (Influencer) Photos: Necessity, Effect, Regulatory Approaches

Do digitally edited photos in social media have to be labeled? On behalf of the Commission for the Protection of Minors in the Media (KJM), the HBI investigated the necessity of a legal labeling requirement for edited photos and videos. The expert opinion was presented to the public on 5 February 2025 and is available for download here as a working paper.

Illustration: ein oranger Roboter sitzt inmitten schwarzer Figuren, die Menschen darstellen
Projekt Project of the DFG Research Group ComAI

Communicative AI and Deliberative Quality

What impact do social bots that use Large Language Models (LLMs) have on the quality of political discourse? The project investigates communicative AI in the social domain of political discourse using discourse monitoring and discourse intervention and thus with a largely experimental approach. The case studies are debates in German on the topic of climate change on X, Mastodon and Bluesky.

Cover of the online article on “Mediendiskurs”
Publikation Article on the Platform mediendiskurs

About Constant Dripping and the Sum of Its Parts

The article by Stephan Dreyer and Sünje Andresen examines the challenges that arise for the regulatory framework of child and youth media protection as a result of “micro content” and the cross-platform media use of children and young people, and investigates whether and how regulation can do justice to these new realities.

Cover of a publication
Publikation Conversational Atmosphere Report

Information Ecosystems and Troubled Democracy

Do information ecosystems weaken democracy and promote the viral spread of mis- and disinformation? In the report “Information Ecosystems and Troubled Democracy: A Global Synthesis of the State of Knowledge on New Media, AI and Data Governance”, an international team of researchers assesses the role of information ecosystems.

Mit Dall-E generierte Illustration eines Newsrooms, den ein Roboter und ein Mensch betreten
Projekt Project of the DFG Research Group ComAI

Automation of News and Journalistic Autonomy

The project, which is part of the DFG research group ComAI, investigates communicative AI in journalism by analyzing the associated challenges for journalistic autonomy at the interactional, organizational, and societal levels.

Handydisplay mit mehren App-Icons Chat GPT
Projekt Project of the DFG Research Group ComAI

The Juridification of Communicative AI

The project, which is part of the DFG research group ComAI, is investigating the legal framework for communicative bots (in particular ChatGPT) and social bots (in particular X and Facebook) – on the one hand from the perspective of communication law, and on the other hand from the perspective of emerging AI regulation.

1 2 3 7

Page 1 from 7

Newsletter

Information about current projects, events and publications of the institute.

Subscribe now