Social Media Observatory

The Social Media Observatory (SMO) enables the systematic and continuous observation of the journalistic and social media public. Therefore, it provides a monitoring and data infrastructure that can be used to capture, analyse and visualise debates in social media.

The SMO is a central organisational unit of the Research Institute Social Cohesion (RISC) with the task of providing all interested RISC projects with data, tools and expertise to enable them to independently address issues related to the media-based public sphere.

The monitoring infrastructure established in the first funding phase of the RISC (2020-2024) will be consolidated and expanded to capture, analyse and visualise actors and discourses in social media platforms and journalistic media offerings. This is done, on the one hand, by setting up and maintaining cloud infrastructure, code and software, and, on the other hand, by collecting and providing basic data, such as the ‘Database of Public Speakers’ (DBÖS) and large-scale collections of network data from various social media platforms.

The SMO also offers target group-specific workshops for beginners and advanced users, as well as for RISC projects, and shares the knowledge gained in a wiki-based knowledge platform. Among other things, a guide for research ethics in social media research (SOCRATES; Rau/Münch/Asli 2021) was published there.

In cooperation with other RISC sections, the SMO investigates the dynamics of polarization in digital public spheres and the transformation of gender discourses in social media.
The SMO works with data journalists from various media houses to support their work and to prepare its own findings for the general public.

Information on the First Funding Phase

As the central organizational unit of the RISC, the SMO fulfilled five main tasks in the first funding phase:

  1. The conception and implementation of a technical infrastructure consisting of cloud-based virtual servers, a comprehensive database of social actors and organizations and specially developed open source scripts and freely accessible software packages, which will be used throughout the project period for the a) continuous and stakeholder-related and b) systematic monitoring of media-based publicity on a case-by-case basis (INFRA);
  2. The creation and maintenance of a German-language “handout” in the form of a wiki that refers to existing data sets, tools, software packages or similar in the field of “(social) media observation” (DOKU);
  3. The development of a training program with regular biannual workshops on the collection and analysis of social media data (WORK);
  4. The establishment of a contact and advice center that supports the consortium partners in the pre-processing, analysis and evaluation of (social) media data on a project-related basis as required, e.g. through scheduled and project-based consultation hours (BERA);
  5. Collaboration with external institutional partners (GESIS, Social Science One) to ensure the secure, reliable and long-term archiving of the (social) media data collected within the consortium and thus tap into its reuse potential (ARCH).

Logo sponsored Federal Ministry of Education and Research

Project details

Overview

Start of the term: 2020; End of term: 2027

Research programme: Media Research Methods Lab

Co-operation partners

Contact person

Felix Victor Münch

Dr. Felix Victor Münch

Postdoc Computational Social Science

Leibniz Institute for Media Research | Hans-Bredow-Institut (HBI)
Rothenbaumchaussee 36
20148 Hamburg
Germany

Similar projects & publications

Cover of the first volume of the EU publication series

The Protection of Freedom of Expression in the Digital Services Act

The publication "Der Schutz der Meinungsäusserungsfreiheit im Digital Services Act" [The Protection of Freedom of Expression in the Digital Services Act], to which Matthias C. Kettemann contributed significantly, is the first in a series of KommAustria publications on the DSA, which are intended to provide a basis for understanding the DSA and contribute to a more differentiated discussion.

Cover of Working Paper No. 76
Publikation Project Findings Available for Download

Between Curiosity and Skepticism: Use and Perception of Generative AI for Information Search in Germany

The research project "Generative Artificial Intelligence for Information Navigation", funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF), investigated to what extent, for what purposes and for what reasons the German population uses generative artificial intelligence in applications such as ChatGPT or Google Gemini. The findings can be downloaded as a working paper.

Cover of the 6/2025 issue of the New Journal of Administrative Law.
Publikation Article in Journal for Administrative Law

Trusted Flaggers Are Not Authorized Agents!

In the current issue of the Neue Zeitschrift für Verwaltungsrecht, Tobias Mast challenges the increasingly prominent view in legal literature that trusted flaggers under Art. 22 of the Digital Services Act (DSA) are public authorities in the sense of German administrative law.

Cover of the Publication
Publikation Education Study in Media Perspektiven

The Population’s View of ZDF’s Educational Function

A study on the educational mandate of the ZDF has for the first time examined the population's educational expectations and perceptions. Jan-Hinrik Schmidt, Uwe Hasebrink and Dieter Storll were involved in an advisory capacity in the design and evaluation of the study and have presented the core findings in detail in an article.

Auf schwarz-weißem Schachbrett stehen sich weiße und schwarze Figuren gegenüber
Projekt DAAD cooperation project

Mapping Polarization in News Media Content

How are polarizing topics reported in Germany and Australia – and does this reporting contribute to the polarization of political attitudes? The project examines how news content in both countries differs in its coverage of controversial issues – and whether this reporting contains potentially polarizing elements.

Cover of the Handbook Digital Journalism
Publikation Recently Published

Handbook of Digital Journalism

The second edition of the Routledge Companion to Digital Journalism Studies offers a collection of 54 essays addressing current issues and debates in the field of digital journalism studies, including two articles by Julius Reimer / Wiebke Loosen and Lisa Merten.

Cover von Heft 1/2025 der Zeitschrift M&K
Publikation Available Open Access

Issue 1/2025 of M&K Published

Issue 1/2025 of our journal Media & Communication Studies (M&K) has been published, including articles on journalism in Germany in 2023, on the role of Google and YouTube in the dissemination of conspiracy theories, and on journalistic role expectations and ideals of social coexistence in the German population. All content can be downloaded for free from the Nomos eLibrary.

Cover of the journal Computational Communication Research
Publikation Open Access Article

Data Donations from Journalism

In their article “I Really Thought I Would Use More Than Just Google: Investigating Professional Journalistic Online Use with Browser History Donations”, Lisa Merten, Felix Victor Münch and Maren Schuster describe how the method of data donation can be used to investigate professional media use in journalism. The article was published in the open access journal Computational Communication Research.

Cover des Nomos-Handbuchs Journalismusforschung
Publikation Recently Published

Journalism Research

A new Nomos Handbook, edited by Thomas Hanitzsch, Wiebke Loosen and Annika Sehl, offers an insight into the diversity of research on journalism in its social context. It looks, among other things, at actors, organisations and institutions, as well as at news, how it is produced and how it is used. The volume reflects the thematic, theoretical and methodological diversity of research.

Portrait Jan-Ole Harfst
Publikation Blog Post on Verfassungsblog

Elections in a Fortified Platform Democracy

The integrity of the German parliamentary elections and future European elections has been and continues to be threatened by influence peddling via social networks. The Digital Services Act (DSA) is supposed to provide a remedy against election manipulation. In a blog post on the Verfassungsblog, Jan-Ole Harfst explains why Art. 34-35 of the DSA could hardly remedy the systemic risks of this federal election campaign.

1 2 3 8

Page 1 from 8

Newsletter

Information about current projects, events and publications of the institute.

Subscribe now