Journalism under Duress: Risk and Uncertainty in a Changing Mediascape

As part of the world’s largest journalism study, “Worlds of Journalism”, this representative survey examines the profession of journalism and explores the stresses and strains faced by professional journalists in Germany.

The third wave of the study series Worlds of Journalism has started. The aim of the international research network is to examine the state and change of journalism and to classify the findings comparatively – both across national and cultural borders as well as over time. Research teams in more than 100 countries participate and conduct representative surveys of journalists in their countries based on a jointly developed questionnaire. This unique global cooperation in journalism research is supported by UNESCO, Reporters Without Borders and the International Federation of Journalists, among others. The study series serves as an important source of information for actors in the media, research and politics (see also www.worldsofjournalism.org).

In Germany, the Leibniz Institute for Media Research | Hans-Bredow-Institut (HBI) is responsible for the project. From September 2022 until February 2023, the opinion research institute Ipsos conducted a representative survey of full-time journalists on behalf of the HBI and in close cooperation with the project team. It goes without saying that all provisions of the EU General Data Protection Regulation were complied with.

In addition to the German country report, the results will be included in joint analyses of the DACH region in coordination with the project teams in Austria and Switzerland, as well as in the global comparison. The Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München is responsible for the international coordination.

Journalism under Duress

The survey focuses on how journalists deal with risks and uncertainties in a media world that is characterised by constant political, economic, technological and cultural change. We focus on seven key areas: editorial autonomy, perceived influences on journalism, journalistic roles, journalistic epistemologies, professional ethics, safety of journalists and working conditions in journalism. For the first time since 2015, we also collect important key figures on the journalistic profession.

In order to enable a comparison between countries, the survey was based on a uniform methodological design. It includes a common questionnaire as well as instructions on defining the populations, sampling, conducting the data collection and collecting and processing survey data. Participants were drawn in a two-stage stratified random sample and then contacted by the survey institute.

In addition to the representative survey, various groups of so-called “peripheral actors” who operate more on the fringes of established journalism will be surveyed in Germany, Austria and Switzerland in the further course of the project in fall 2023.

Methodology

The methodological procedure for the representative survey is divided into the following steps:

Determining the basic population: Based on defined criteria, we identify all relevant editorial units in Germany and determine their editorial sizes. We distinguish between the segments of newspapers, advertising journals, magazines, news agencies, media services and suppliers, private radio, private TV, public broadcasting and online media. The information comes from databases (Zimpel, ZMG Newspaper Atlas 2021/22, AGOF, IVW, state media authorities, etc.), media websites and direct information by e-mail or telephone.

Sampling and contact research: The sample size and its distribution among the media segments are calculated from the basic population. In addition, we estimate the proportions of freelance media professionals per segment on an informed basis. This is used as the basis for drawing the sample of editorial units stratified by segments. The next step is to research journalists who work for the units drawn with the sample. For this purpose, we use databases (Zimpel) as well as publicly available lists and self-disclosures such as imprints, “about us” statements and professional networks. From these lists of persons, we randomly select the journalists who will be contacted. The contact details are taken from the above-mentioned sources.

Field time and analysis: The surveys were conducted by the opinion research institute Ipsos under the direction of the Leibniz Institute for Media Research │ Hans-Bredow-Institut (German coordination) and the Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (global coordination). Respondents could choose to answer by telephone or online (self-completion version). The field period started in September 2022 and lasted almost six months. The evaluation will be anonymous, i.e. not linked to names of persons or media. All personal data will be deleted after project completion.

Supplementary sample: After the representative survey has been completed, we will conduct an additional survey of people from the peripheral area of journalism in Germany, Austria and Switzerland. For this purpose, several sub-samples will first be formed, to which corresponding organizational units and persons working in them will be assigned. The survey of peripheral actors is expected to start in fall 2023.

Findings of the German Sub-Study

  • The average journalist in Germany is still male, but the proportion of women in the industry has increased in recent years, rising from 40 to 44 percent since 2015. Traditional print houses are still the most important employers. Just over half of German journalists work for a newspaper or magazine publisher. Television and radio each account for 17 percent. Like our average journalist, almost 90 percent of those surveyed work full-time. 80 percent are permanent employees.
  • Many journalists in Germany are under pressure. Every second person states that they have “often” or “very often” suffered from stress at work in the past six months. The majority of respondents have also experienced humiliating or hateful comments in the last five years. About 62 percent have experienced public discrediting of their work.
  • How do journalists in Germany see their role in society? For them, one of the most important tasks is to provide information and enable people to form an opinion. It is also very important for them to counteract disinformation, classify current events and observe them impartially.
  • Journalists in Germany continue to hold the standards of their industry high. 98% of those surveyed stated that they would not accept money from information sources under any circumstances. Gifts of products or services would not be accepted by 87 percent under any circumstances.
  • According to more than three quarters of respondents, freedom of expression in Germany is “very” or “completely free”. Time pressure and the availability of resources for reporting are perceived as the strongest influences on journalistic work. In the eyes of the respondents, government officials and state censorship have the least influence.

Downloads

Click here for the comprehensive cross-country report “Journalism Under Duress. Worlds of Journalism Study Report (Wave 3: 2021–2025)”.

Click here for the findings of the German sub-study. These findings have also been summarized in a video.

Picture: Markus Spiske auf Unsplash

Project details

Overview

Start of the term: 2021; End of term: 2024

Co-operation partners

  • Prof. Dr. Thomas Hanitzsch, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
  • Prof. Dr. Vinzenz Wyss, ZHAW Zurich University of Applied Sciences
  • Dr. Josef Seethaler, Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften

Contact person

Wiebke Loosen

Prof. Dr. Wiebke Loosen

Senior Researcher Journalism Research

Leibniz Institute for Media Research | Hans-Bredow-Institut
Warburgstraße 30b
20354 Hamburg

Similar projects & publications

Publikation Review of a Dissertation

Government Public Relations in New Media

For years, the democratic legitimacy of government public relations has been a topic of discussion in academic literature and constitutional jurisprudence. Tobias Mast reviews a recently published dissertation on the subject, exploring the untapped potential of interdisciplinary legal scholarship in relation to commonly accepted empirical assumptions.

Publikation Article for Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung

Platform Badges for Civic Communication

Digital platforms have become central infrastructures for political communication and social negotiation processes. In his article, Jan Rau examines platform badges, which are tools that platforms use to fulfill their obligation to mitigate risk by creating positive incentives for users to adhere to certain communicative norms.

Cover des Arbeitspapiers
Publikation Working Paper for Download

Responsibility in the Platform Quadrangle

This working paper by Tobias Mast comments on the European Court of Justice's recent Russmedia ruling and sets out the premises for a relationship between EU legal acts in the digital single market that respects fundamental rights.

ein Kabel führt in ein Smartphone
Projekt Project with Helmut Schmidt University

Data Collection and Analysis on TikTok and YouTube

In order to develop the best practices for collecting and analyzing data on short video platforms, Gregor Wiedemann's Media Research Methods Lab at the HBI is participating in a Helmut Schmidt University project examining the German Armed Forces' representation on TikTok and YouTube.

Eine Fernbedienung zeigt auf einen Bildschirm mit unscharfen bunten Bildern
Projekt International Cooperation Project

Euromedia Ownership Monitor

The Euromedia Ownership Monitor provides policymakers and the general public with in-depth insights into the extent of media ownership transparency in the EU. It was updated in 2025.

Cover of the special issue on datafication, 1/2026, M&K
Publikation M&K Issue 1/2026 Published Open Access

On the Datafication of Communication

The special issue of M&K titled "The Datafication of Communication: New Methodological Approaches and Challenges" has been published as Issue 1/2026. The guest editors are Julia Niemann-Lenz, Tim Schatto-Eckrodt, Emese Domahidi, and Merja Mahrt.

Cover of the book
Publikation Article Published in Handbook

Growing Up in Data-Intensive and Automated (Media) Environments

Dr. Claudia Lampert examines changing usage practices and possible implications for socialization research in the chapter “Growing Up in Data-Intensive and Automated (Media) Environments” of the handbook “Media Socialization in ‘Smart’ Environments. Self- and Social Development in the Context of Datafication and Automation,” edited by Laura Sūna and Wolfgang Reißmann.

Cover of the report “Generative AI from the Perspective of Young People”
Publikation Publication on Safer Internet Day 2026

Generative AI from the Perspective of Young People

The use of generative AI, especially ChatGPT, is now firmly established among young people online. A study by Kira Thiel, Claudia Lampert and Eleysa Memis explores young people's views on generative AI, highlighting its significance in their daily lives.

Cover des Arbeitspapiers
Publikation Working Paper Available for Download

Public Service Media Enabling Dialogue

For the project “Dialog Formats in Public Service Media,” Magdalena Stratmann conducted a literature analysis on “The Role of Public Service Media as Enablers of Dialogue in Digitalized Societies.” This analysis is now available for download as a working paper.

Vorschau des Artikels von Christian Ollig auf epd Medien
Publikation Article for epd Medien

How the Digital Services Act (DSA) Regulates Platforms

U.S. politicians accuse the European Union of endangering freedom of expression with the Digital Services Act (DSA). However, media law expert Dr. Christian Ollig argues that the DSA actually protects users' opinions from arbitrary censorship by platform operators. It also gives users a legal basis to assert their freedom of expression against large platform operators at the European level.

1 2 3 13

Page 1 from 13

Newsletter

Information about current projects, events and publications of the institute.

Subscribe now