Repository for Policy Documents

The establishment of a repository, which exclusively comprises publications on scientific consulting on politics and society from the entire German scientific system, is intended to create a targeted information and consulting infrastructure for actors from politics, administration and other areas of society. The Leibniz Institute for Media Research is supporting the development by conducting accompanying scientific research into the process of generating and using documents on political and social consulting.

Science-led policy advice has gained enormously in importance in recent years and has continually become more diverse. Political decisions are increasingly based on empirical research results and expert opinions. However, searching for advisory documents can be tedious and time-consuming, as they are scattered on various websites and often cannot be searched for specifically. For this reason, the “Repository for Policy Documents” (REPOD) is now being launched supported by the Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF).

With REPOD, a digital repository is being established that makes advisory documents searchable across disciplines in a targeted manner and which ensures uniform quality assurance. The goal is to create an information and advisory infrastructure by the end of 2023 that will make the transfer of knowledge from research to politics and society much easier.

Led by the ZBW – Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, the research consortium consists of scientists from the Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society (HIIG), the Leibniz Institute for Media Research | Hans-Bredow-Institut (HBI), the Leibniz Institute for Research on Society and Space (IRS),  and the RWI – Leibniz Institute for Economic Research, The Leibniz Association is involved as an associated partner.

Using Documents for Policy and Societal Advice

The Leibniz Institute for Media Research | Hans-Bredow-Institut (HBI) takes over part of the scientific accompanying research in REPOD. In close cooperation with the Leibniz Institute for Research on Society and Space (IRS), the processes for the production and use of scientific advisory documents are being researched. These processes involve a heterogeneous group of actors from science, politics, administration, media, and civil society. While the HBI examines the perspectives of the producers, the IRS focuses on the users of such advisory documents.

To gain practical insights into the identification of topics, the selection and translation of knowledge, and the dissemination and evaluation of advisory documents, the HBI uses qualitative methods such as ethnographic observations, retrospective interviews and content analyses. In this way, a multitude of actors, their practices and goal orientations are captured in the different steps involved in the production of scientific advisory documents. To map the entire processes of action and communication around such documents, these findings are mirrored by the results of the user perspective analysed by the IRS. Concrete suggestions for the development of scientific advisory documents and the design of the repository, such as matchmaking, search, and mapping functions as well as reputation mechanisms, are derived from the identified practices, challenges and opportunities (cf. Berr et al. 2022).

How Can Policy Papers Be Found?

Scientific advice to politics and society has steadily gained in importance in Germany. More and more non-university research institutions, universities, colleges, academies, etc. see science-based advice to politics and society as their task. The field is dominated by policy papers, expert reports, and studies that are oriented towards a social problem, present and contextualize the state of scientific knowledge in a generally understandable language and point out options for action.

The central problem addressed by the project “Repository for Policy Documents (REPOD)” is the ability to find and access these documents. By setting up a repository that exclusively comprises publications of scientific policy and societal advice from the entire German science system, a targeted information and advice infrastructure is created for actors from politics, administration, and other areas of society.

Existing data and literature resources will be made accessible, searchable, and findable across disciplines (work package 1). For this purpose, a cloud-based information infrastructure will be established (work package 2). The accompanying scientific research (work package 3) uses stakeholder workshops and interviews with scientific actors from various disciplines as well as actors from politics, administration, the media and social institutions to develop approaches to quality assurance and criteria for the use of scientific advisory documents as well as the repository (work package 3.1). The HBI will use qualitative methods to gain insights into the challenges and needs of the actors involved in the process from the creation to the use of the advisory document as an important instrument of scientific policy advice (work package 3.2). This is accompanied by interactive exchange formats as well as marketing and communication campaigns (work package 4).

Logo sponsored Federal Ministry of Education and Research
Photo by Christa Dodoo on Unsplash

Project details

Overview

Start of the term: 2023; End of term: 2024

Research programme: RP 3 Knowledge for the Media Society

Contact person

Hans-Ulrich Wagner

Dr. Hans-Ulrich Wagner

Senior Researcher Media History

Research Centre Media History
Leibniz Institute for Media Research | Hans-Bredow-Institut (HBI)
Rothenbaumchaussee 36
20148 Hamburg
Germany

Similar projects & publications

Cover of the first volume of the EU publication series

The Protection of Freedom of Expression in the Digital Services Act

The publication "Der Schutz der Meinungsäusserungsfreiheit im Digital Services Act" [The Protection of Freedom of Expression in the Digital Services Act], to which Matthias C. Kettemann contributed significantly, is the first in a series of KommAustria publications on the DSA, which are intended to provide a basis for understanding the DSA and contribute to a more differentiated discussion.

Cover of Working Paper No. 76
Publikation Project Findings Available for Download

Between Curiosity and Skepticism: Use and Perception of Generative AI for Information Search in Germany

The research project "Generative Artificial Intelligence for Information Navigation", funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF), investigated to what extent, for what purposes and for what reasons the German population uses generative artificial intelligence in applications such as ChatGPT or Google Gemini. The findings can be downloaded as a working paper.

Cover of the 6/2025 issue of the New Journal of Administrative Law.
Publikation Article in Journal for Administrative Law

Trusted Flaggers Are Not Authorized Agents!

In the current issue of the Neue Zeitschrift für Verwaltungsrecht, Tobias Mast challenges the increasingly prominent view in legal literature that trusted flaggers under Art. 22 of the Digital Services Act (DSA) are public authorities in the sense of German administrative law.

Cover of the Publication
Publikation Education Study in Media Perspektiven

The Population’s View of ZDF’s Educational Function

A study on the educational mandate of the ZDF has for the first time examined the population's educational expectations and perceptions. Jan-Hinrik Schmidt, Uwe Hasebrink and Dieter Storll were involved in an advisory capacity in the design and evaluation of the study and have presented the core findings in detail in an article.

Auf schwarz-weißem Schachbrett stehen sich weiße und schwarze Figuren gegenüber
Projekt DAAD cooperation project

Mapping Polarization in News Media Content

How are polarizing topics reported in Germany and Australia – and does this reporting contribute to the polarization of political attitudes? The project examines how news content in both countries differs in its coverage of controversial issues – and whether this reporting contains potentially polarizing elements.

Cover of the Handbook Digital Journalism
Publikation Recently Published

Handbook of Digital Journalism

The second edition of the Routledge Companion to Digital Journalism Studies offers a collection of 54 essays addressing current issues and debates in the field of digital journalism studies, including two articles by Julius Reimer / Wiebke Loosen and Lisa Merten.

Cover von Heft 1/2025 der Zeitschrift M&K
Publikation Available Open Access

Issue 1/2025 of M&K Published

Issue 1/2025 of our journal Media & Communication Studies (M&K) has been published, including articles on journalism in Germany in 2023, on the role of Google and YouTube in the dissemination of conspiracy theories, and on journalistic role expectations and ideals of social coexistence in the German population. All content can be downloaded for free from the Nomos eLibrary.

Cover of the journal Computational Communication Research
Publikation Open Access Article

Data Donations from Journalism

In their article “I Really Thought I Would Use More Than Just Google: Investigating Professional Journalistic Online Use with Browser History Donations”, Lisa Merten, Felix Victor Münch and Maren Schuster describe how the method of data donation can be used to investigate professional media use in journalism. The article was published in the open access journal Computational Communication Research.

Cover des Nomos-Handbuchs Journalismusforschung
Publikation Recently Published

Journalism Research

A new Nomos Handbook, edited by Thomas Hanitzsch, Wiebke Loosen and Annika Sehl, offers an insight into the diversity of research on journalism in its social context. It looks, among other things, at actors, organisations and institutions, as well as at news, how it is produced and how it is used. The volume reflects the thematic, theoretical and methodological diversity of research.

Portrait Jan-Ole Harfst
Publikation Blog Post on Verfassungsblog

Elections in a Fortified Platform Democracy

The integrity of the German parliamentary elections and future European elections has been and continues to be threatened by influence peddling via social networks. The Digital Services Act (DSA) is supposed to provide a remedy against election manipulation. In a blog post on the Verfassungsblog, Jan-Ole Harfst explains why Art. 34-35 of the DSA could hardly remedy the systemic risks of this federal election campaign.

1 2 3 8

Page 1 from 8

Newsletter

Information about current projects, events and publications of the institute.

Subscribe now