Tobias Mast Appointed to the Advisory Board of the Coordination Office for Digital Services under the Digital Services Act

Tobias Mast, head of the research program “Regulatory Structures and the Emergence of Rules in Online Spaces” at the HBI, has been appointed to the advisory board of the Coordination Office for Digital Services.

Tobias Mast represents the field of science on the advisory board together with Prof. Dipl.-Journ. Christina Elmer from TU Dortmund University and Prof. Dr. Henrike Weiden from Munich University of Applied Sciences and Arts.

Further advisory board members are

  • for the civil society: Josephine Ballon from HateAid, Lina Ehrig for the Federation of German Consumer Organizations (vzbv), Matthias Spielkamp for the F5 alliance (AlgorithmWatch, Gesellschaft für Freiheitsrechte, Open Knowledge Foundation Deutschland, Reporters Without Borders and Wikimedia Deutschland), Teresa Widlok for LOAD and Svea Windwehr for the Center for Digital Progress D64;
  • and for the trade associations: Alexander Rabe for eco – Association of the Internet Industry and Susanne Dehmel for Bitkom.

The members of the advisory board will be elected by the German Bundestag this week on the proposal of the coalition parliamentary groups.

From the press release of the SPD parliamentary group in the Bundestag from June, 2nd:

When selecting the candidates, it was important to the coalition parliamentary groups not to base the proposals on party political issues, but solely on digital policy expertise in the respective field. The coalition parliamentary groups expressly welcome the fact that – also in discussions with the CDU/CSU parliamentary group – all democratic parliamentary groups in the German Bundestag have succeeded in proposing a convincing and powerful advisory board that will support the Coordination Office for Digital Services in implementing the DSA.

Jens Zimmermann, digital policy spokesperson for the SPD parliamentary group:
“The Digital Services Coordinator, which is based at the Federal Network Agency, will play a crucial role in enforcing the DSA. I am sure that the outstanding expertise of this advisory board will be an important support in fulfilling this task.”

Tabea Rößner, Chair of the Digital Committee and responsible rapporteur:
“In sensitive regulatory procedures, which may also affect content on the net under the DSA, independence must be a given. However, a non-governmental advisory board can also provide important impetus for enforcement. In the parliamentary procedure for the Digital Services Act, we were able to strengthen the advisory board as an institution, for example with its own rights to information, and are now getting the appointments underway in good time before the summer break.”

Maximilian Funke-Kaiser, digital policy spokesperson for the FDP parliamentary group:
“Now the DDK will receive the expert support it needs for the very different areas of responsibility of the Digital Services Act in Germany. The input from civil society and research will help the DDK to do its job in the best possible way. If the DDK draws on the technical expertise of the Advisory Board, it will be able to do justice to the wide range of tasks arising from the Digital Services Act.”

Two prizes for Johanna Sebauer at the Bachmann competition

Johanna Sebauer won two awards at this year’s Bachmann competition with her highly comical text “Gurkerl“: the 3sat Prize (7,000 euros) and the BKS Bank Audience Award, endowed with 7,000 euros plus a 6,000 euro city writing scholarship in Klagenfurt, Austria.

In her satire, Johanna Sebauer describes how a small, random thing (a drop of cucumber water gets into the eye) develops into a major social scandal and outrage. “Johanna Sebauer proves with her text that literature can be entertaining and funny and still be meaningful. It is about the pickle season. It is about escalation mechanisms in the media. It is also literally about ‘the pickle’ as a subject“, says Austrian literature professor and this year’s jury chairman, Klaus Kastberger. In his laudatory speech, he added: “You have all heard the bravura with which this slippery something and the sour water that surrounds it blows through the text, and how this “Gurkerl” has become established even today. We haven’t heard a word as often as “Gurkerl” today.

The 48. Tagen der deutschsprachigen Literatur [48th Days of German-Language Literature] took place in Klagenfurt from June 26 to 30, 2024. The Ingeborg Bachmann Prize itself, endowed with 25,000 euros, was won by Bosnian-born Tijan Sila from Kaiserslautern.

In her other life, Johanna Sebauer works in science communication at the HBI and regularly hosts the institute’s podcast, the BredowCast.

re:publica Presentations as Video

Three researchers from the Leibniz Institute for Media Research presented the results of their research at this year’s re:publica in Berlin. You can watch the presentations in full length on YouTube.

News Fatigue

Julia Behre spoke in a panel discussion about news fatigue and how media houses deal with it. Other panel participants were Sara Maria Manzo from Tagesschau, Monika Pilath, head of news at Zeit Online and Susanne Amann from SPIEGEL’s investigative team.

Screenshot of the video at Re:publica 2024 on the topic "Only crises, wars, catastrophes? How media companies are dealing with increasing news fatigue

What Is the State of German Journalism?

Journalism researchers Anna von Garmissen and Wiebke Loosen presented the results of their latest study on the state of German journalism.

Screenshot of the video at Re:publica 2024 on the topic of "How is journalism in Germany?"

The re:publica is a conference on digital society, net culture and net politics. It has been held once a year in Berlin since 2007 and is considered the largest of its kind in Europe.

People Who Use Media Also Trust Them – But Not Unconditionally

“Trust in Established News Sources”: A special analysis of data from the Reuters Institute Digital News Survey with findings published as a report and in three short videos.

In Germany, trust in established news sources can best be explained by age: Older internet users tend to place more trust in the news than younger ones. There are also differences regarding political orientation. Respondents who classify their political orientation as right-wing or conservative are generally more skeptical of the news than those who classify themselves on the extreme left or in the political center. In addition, a higher level of formal education tends to go hand in hand with greater trust in the news. As expected, those who use specific news brands also trust them, but not unconditionally. Those who have not used news within a week or have only received it on social media have the least trust. These are the findings of a special analysis of data from the Reuters Institute Digital News Survey 2023 conducted by the Leibniz Institute for Media Research in Hamburg. The findings are available in three short videos and as a working paper.

In 2023, 43% of adult internet users in Germany believed that most of the news in Germany can be trusted – fewer than ever before. Compared to the other 45 countries participating in the Reuters Institute Digital News Survey, Germany ranks 14th. Although this means that news trust in Germany is at a comparatively high level, it has been falling since 2015. Trust in the news that respondents use shows a more stable trend in the long term; only in recent years have there been slight losses here as well.

Overall, however, the individual factors of age, gender, formal education, and political orientation only have a very small influence on general news trust. In addition, the correlations found regarding “trust in news in general” and “trust in the news used” hardly differ.

A comparison between Germany, Finland, Italy, Greece, and the USA – five countries with different levels of news trust and different media systems – shows that news trust increased almost everywhere in the year of the coronavirus pandemic 2021. However, this increase in trust was only consolidated in subsequent years in Finland, which also had the highest level of news trust among the 46 Reuters countries in 2023.

Information on the Study “Trust in Established News Sources”

How do people inform themselves and what are the prerequisites for the formation of social opinion and decision-making processes? The project, funded by the Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF), examines the correlations between the news sources used and the trust placed in news. The data for the analysis comes from the Reuters Institute Digital News Survey, a comprehensive survey that – coordinated by the Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism in Oxford – has been conducted in 46 countries since 2012. The Leibniz Institute for Media Research | Hans-Bredow-Institut (HBI) has been responsible for the German part of the study as a cooperation partner since 2013; it is supported by the state media authorities and ZDF.

Study Available for Download

Behre, Julia; Möller, Judith; Hölig, Sascha (2024): Vertrauen in etablierte Nachrichtenquellen. Eine Studie basierend auf dem Reuters Institute Digital News Survey [Trust in Established News Sources. A Study Based on the Reuters Institute Digital News Survey]. Hamburg: Verlag Hans-Bredow-Institut, March 2024 (Working Papers of the Hans-Bredow-Institut | Project Results No. 71), DOI: https://doi.org/10.21241/ssoar.93328, ISBN 978-3-87296-185-3 (Open Access, licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License CC BY 4.0).
The issues of the series “Working Papers of the Hans-Bredow-Institut” can be downloaded from the Institute’s website at https://leibniz-hbi.de/en/publications/working_papers.

Videos

Three short videos with the core findings of the study can be found on YouTube (in German): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dRoMAdetxn0

Newsletter

Information about current projects, events and publications of the institute.

Subscribe now