Coding Public Value – Public Service Media and Software for the Common Good

How can we develop software that is not only oriented towards business models, but also towards the common good, user interests, and media regulation? Coding Public Value (CPV) translates questions on media law, user orientation, and the integration of political and social stakeholders into approaches and methods for a responsible software engineering as well as institutional, political, and regulatory recommendations in the area of public service media libraries.

The project ‘Coding Public Value’ focuses on the development and evaluation of methods for responsible software engineering for the common good and corresponding institutional, political and organizational frameworks for public-service media platforms. How can legal, political and user-oriented requirements of public media be translated into requirements, methods and quality assessment practices for the engineering of software and which institutional, political, and organizational requirements have to be implemented in order to operate public service media platforms on the foundation of such public service-oriented software engineering?

The project combines science & technology studies, media and communication research, legal studies (this will be the task of the associated partner HBI), and empirical software engineering in an interdisciplinary collaboration.

The project will provide an analysis of stakeholders in the media sector, the media law and regulatory framework and of usage and market potentials. Furthermore, prototypical implementations are also planned.

Project Description

The Bavarian Research Institute for Digital Transformation (bidt) of the Bavarian Academy of Sciences and Humanities (BAdW) supports projects that investigate current issues of digital transformation and are interdisciplinary and cross-locational. Criteria for selection were high scientific quality, interdisciplinary access, and the social and political relevance of the proposed topics. Press Release of the bidt (in German): https://www.bidt.digital/bidt-foerdert-neun-forschungsprojekte-zur-digitalisierung/

The project contributes to society in three dimensions:

  • on a practical level, the project develops methods of public-interest oriented software engineering and prototypical implementations and thus contributes to the concretization of the social debate on alternative media and platform technologies in Europe;
  • on a political-regulatory level, the project develops recommendations for action and implementation and corresponding feasibility analyses that show political capacity for action beyond the regulation of digital technologies;
  • on a socio-public level, the project carries out co-design oriented stakeholder multilogs in order to involve public engagement in the development of technical and regulatory implementation proposals.

The project is designed to develop and evaluate media policy design options in the context of developing concrete technical implementations in prototypes and procedures.

The Leibniz Institute for Media Research is responsible for the media law work package: The core of the legal framework for the public broadcasters is the public programming mandate in Section 11 of the Interstate Broadcasting Treaty (RStV), in addition to the individual legal foundations for establishing the respective institution (e.g. BRG Act, SWR-StV). In the area of telemedia services, Sections 11d, 11f RStV also stipulate specific requirements and procedures that a new or modified online service from public broadcasters must undergo. The resulting service concepts contain a large number of specific and undefined concept requirements and voluntary commitments, which, however, generally relate to the content of the service.

The media law work package therefore presents the existing legal framework and identifies the current different content-related mission dimensions. They will be examined in terms of their application to content management and distribution, search and suggestion systems and filter technologies. Constitutional and simple-law dimensions of specific public-law offerings of this kind will be worked out. On the level of telemedia concepts, the available final telemedia concepts according to § 11f RStV will be analysed and those forms of self-regulation will be presented in aggregated form that refer to approaches and requirements for algorithmic selections.

The tasks in this work package lead to the presentation of the existing legal framework and questions of its applicability and concretisation in algorithmic procedures within telemedially provided offers in a systematic catalogue of requirements for corresponding systems. Positive requirements (diversity dimensions, balance, transparency) and negative limits (protection of personal rights, data protection, protection of minors in the media, responsibility for inadmissible statements by third parties, prohibition of press similarity, etc.) will be considered in a differentiated way.

In addition, the media law perspective is also incorporated into the further work packages of the cooperation partners: In the context of the creation of software prototypes, the media-law central question is how legal requirements and normative self-commitment can be efficiently transformed into software requirements (functional and non-functional)? Which structural framework conditions for current and future forms of regulation and their concretization are necessary for this?

Photo by Kelvyn Ornettte Sol Marte on Unsplash.

Project details

Overview

Start of the term: 2020; End of term: 2022

Research programme: RP 3 Knowledge for the Media Society

Contact person

Stephan Dreyer

Dr. Stephan Dreyer

Senior Researcher Media Law & Media Governance

We are no longer located at Rothenbaumchaussee 36. You can reach us temporarely at the following address:

Leibniz Institute for Media Research, Hans-Bredow-Institut
c/o betahaus | Gänsemarkt
Gänsemarkt 43
20354 Hamburg

Similar projects & publications

Cover des Buchs "Recht der Digitalisierung"
Publikation Available Open Access

Law of Digitalization

Can the right legal framework meet the central challenges of digitization? This volume, edited by Prof. Dr. Matthias C. Kettemann, explores important new areas of law, the regulation of AI, the role of digital services, and the characteristics of effective technology policy and sensible innovation law.

Screenshot der ersten "Seite" des Artikels auf dem Verfassungsblog
Publikation Article on Verfassungsblog

DSA Enforcement by the EU Commission

The problematic role of the European Commission in enforcing the Digital Services Act (DSA) and possible alternatives are the focus of a blog post published by Jan-Ole Harfst, Dr. Tobias Mast, and Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Schulz on 16 July 2025 on the Verfassungblog.

Cover der Zeitschrift
Publikation Recently Published

Community Data Trust for Sensitive Data

Jan Rau, Moritz Fürneisen, and Gregor Wiedemann co-developed the concept of community data stewardship to facilitate the collaborative creation and utilization of sensitive data in communication science. By using the example of research into right-wing extremist online communication, they demonstrate how community data stewardship can be structured.

Cover der Zeitschrift UFITA
Publikation Recently Published

On the Public Value of Public Service Media

"What Can Audience Research findings tell us about the public value of public service media?" This question explored by Prof. Dr. Uwe Hasebrink and PD Dr. Jan-Hinrik Schmidt, who published their insights in the issue 2/2024 of the journal UFITA.

Cover der Broschüre zum 75. Geburtstag
Publikation Brochure Available for Download

Facets of 75 Years Hans-Bredow-Institut

With this brochure. we take a look at the institute's development since 1950. While we do not claim to provide a complete history, we aim to highlight some of the institute's unique characteristics, showcasing moments in the past when these features were particularly evident.

Cover von Heft 2/2025 M&K
Publikation Recently Published

M&K 2/2025 Special Issue “Media Structures Revisited”

Issue 2/2025 of Media & Communication Science has been published as a special issue entitled “Media Structures Revisited,” edited by Josef Seethaler, Marlis Prinzing, Petra Herczeg, and Mark Eisenegger. The entire issue is available open access via the Nomos eLibrary.

Cover der Publikation "
Publikation Research Project on Misinformation and Disinformation

Destructive Discourses

The final research report, jointly written as part of the NOTORIOUS research project, looks at how climate-related misinformation and disinformation spreads across different platforms. At the HBI, Philipp Keßling, Dr. Felix Victor Münch, Dr. Gregor Wiedemann, and Mattes Ruckdeschel worked on the report.

Bild des 1600 Seiten starken Kommnatrs
Publikation The most comprehensive HBI publication ever!

DSA DMA Commentary

It is the most extensive publication the HBI has ever produced: the 1600-page commentary on the Digital Services Act (DSA) and the Digital Markets Act (DMA), edited by Tobias Mast, Matthias C. Kettemann, Stephan Dreyer and Wolfgang Schulz. In addition to several current and former researchers from the institute, almost 30 other experts from Germany, Austria and Switzerland were recruited for the commentary project.

Cover des Kurzgutachtens
Publikation Brief Expert Opinion

State Treaty on the Reform of the Procedure for Setting the Broadcasting License Fee

Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Schulz and Dr. Tobias Mast have provided their expert opinion on the State Treaty on the Reform of the Procedure for Setting the Broadcasting Fee (RFinÄStV). At the end of 2004, the federal states had decided to separate the pillars of the reform of public broadcasting and to adopt the draft reform first and to continue the process of reforming the procedure for setting the licence fee separately.

Cover of the first volume of the EU publication series

The Protection of Freedom of Expression in the Digital Services Act

The publication "Der Schutz der Meinungsäusserungsfreiheit im Digital Services Act" [The Protection of Freedom of Expression in the Digital Services Act], to which Matthias C. Kettemann contributed significantly, is the first in a series of KommAustria publications on the DSA, which are intended to provide a basis for understanding the DSA and contribute to a more differentiated discussion.

1 2 3 9

Page 1 from 9

Newsletter

Information about current projects, events and publications of the institute.

Subscribe now