Coding Public Value – Public Service Media and Software for the Common Good

How can we develop software that is not only oriented towards business models, but also towards the common good, user interests, and media regulation? Coding Public Value (CPV) translates questions on media law, user orientation, and the integration of political and social stakeholders into approaches and methods for a responsible software engineering as well as institutional, political, and regulatory recommendations in the area of public service media libraries.

The project ‘Coding Public Value’ focuses on the development and evaluation of methods for responsible software engineering for the common good and corresponding institutional, political and organizational frameworks for public-service media platforms. How can legal, political and user-oriented requirements of public media be translated into requirements, methods and quality assessment practices for the engineering of software and which institutional, political, and organizational requirements have to be implemented in order to operate public service media platforms on the foundation of such public service-oriented software engineering?

The project combines science & technology studies, media and communication research, legal studies (this will be the task of the associated partner HBI), and empirical software engineering in an interdisciplinary collaboration.

The project will provide an analysis of stakeholders in the media sector, the media law and regulatory framework and of usage and market potentials. Furthermore, prototypical implementations are also planned.

Project Description

The Bavarian Research Institute for Digital Transformation (bidt) of the Bavarian Academy of Sciences and Humanities (BAdW) supports projects that investigate current issues of digital transformation and are interdisciplinary and cross-locational. Criteria for selection were high scientific quality, interdisciplinary access, and the social and political relevance of the proposed topics. Press Release of the bidt (in German): https://www.bidt.digital/bidt-foerdert-neun-forschungsprojekte-zur-digitalisierung/

The project contributes to society in three dimensions:

  • on a practical level, the project develops methods of public-interest oriented software engineering and prototypical implementations and thus contributes to the concretization of the social debate on alternative media and platform technologies in Europe;
  • on a political-regulatory level, the project develops recommendations for action and implementation and corresponding feasibility analyses that show political capacity for action beyond the regulation of digital technologies;
  • on a socio-public level, the project carries out co-design oriented stakeholder multilogs in order to involve public engagement in the development of technical and regulatory implementation proposals.

The project is designed to develop and evaluate media policy design options in the context of developing concrete technical implementations in prototypes and procedures.

The Leibniz Institute for Media Research is responsible for the media law work package: The core of the legal framework for the public broadcasters is the public programming mandate in Section 11 of the Interstate Broadcasting Treaty (RStV), in addition to the individual legal foundations for establishing the respective institution (e.g. BRG Act, SWR-StV). In the area of telemedia services, Sections 11d, 11f RStV also stipulate specific requirements and procedures that a new or modified online service from public broadcasters must undergo. The resulting service concepts contain a large number of specific and undefined concept requirements and voluntary commitments, which, however, generally relate to the content of the service.

The media law work package therefore presents the existing legal framework and identifies the current different content-related mission dimensions. They will be examined in terms of their application to content management and distribution, search and suggestion systems and filter technologies. Constitutional and simple-law dimensions of specific public-law offerings of this kind will be worked out. On the level of telemedia concepts, the available final telemedia concepts according to § 11f RStV will be analysed and those forms of self-regulation will be presented in aggregated form that refer to approaches and requirements for algorithmic selections.

The tasks in this work package lead to the presentation of the existing legal framework and questions of its applicability and concretisation in algorithmic procedures within telemedially provided offers in a systematic catalogue of requirements for corresponding systems. Positive requirements (diversity dimensions, balance, transparency) and negative limits (protection of personal rights, data protection, protection of minors in the media, responsibility for inadmissible statements by third parties, prohibition of press similarity, etc.) will be considered in a differentiated way.

In addition, the media law perspective is also incorporated into the further work packages of the cooperation partners: In the context of the creation of software prototypes, the media-law central question is how legal requirements and normative self-commitment can be efficiently transformed into software requirements (functional and non-functional)? Which structural framework conditions for current and future forms of regulation and their concretization are necessary for this?

Photo by Kelvyn Ornettte Sol Marte on Unsplash.

Project details

Overview

Start of the term: 2020; End of term: 2022

Research programme: RP 3 Knowledge for the Media Society

Contact person

Portrait von Stephan Dreyer

Dr. Stephan Dreyer

Senior Researcher Media Law & Media Governance

Leibniz Institute for Media Research | Hans-Bredow-Institut
Warburgstraße 30b
20354 Hamburg

Similar projects & publications

Publikation Recently Published

Visualizing Regulatory Ecosystems: The AI Act as a Case Study

The article by Magdalena Stratmann, Tobias Mast, and others was developed as part of the STEAM project, "Informing Regulatory Reasoning on Algorithmic Systems in Societal Communication with STEAM." It introduces Architectural Ecosystem Modeling, a visual method that makes the institutional structures of the AI Act visible. This method analyzes responsibilities and dependencies and identifies gaps, overlaps, and opportunities for coordination within the regulatory framework.

eine Frau hinter einem Tisch mit ablehnender Haltung gegenüber Zeitungen auf dem Tisch.
Projekt New Project!

Practices of News Avoidance and Their Implications for Public Connection

What are the effects of news avoidance on belonging to different publics and on political participation? And to what extent do these dynamics contribute to the fragmentation of public spheres? This study examines the effects of different practices of news avoidance on individuals‘ public connection.

Projekt BMFTR Project

Podcasts: Actors, Topics, and Misinformation

As audio media, such as podcasts, become more widely used, the risks of them distributing misinformation, disinformation, and fake news increase. The collaborative project “Systematic Observation of New Auditive Risks” (SONAR) examines the structure of online audio media offerings and develops methods for identifying relevant narratives and manipulation strategies.

Publikation Merz issue and Podcast Available!

Thoughts on the Debate Over Media Bans

Dr. Claudia Lampert, together with Klaus Lutz (Parabol Media Center), edited the latest issue of the media education journal “merz” (2/2026). The issue is titled “Everything Under Control? Thoughts on the Debate Over Media Bans.” Dr. Stephan Dreyer also contributed an article.

Publikation Available for Download

Annual Report 2023-2025

Evaluation, growth, our 75th anniversary, and a new building. The years from 2023 to 2025 were challenging yet fruitful. Our research output was impressive, and our social impact was significant. This annual report provides a brief overview of our activities.

Publikation Open Access Publication

Determinants of Verification Behavior in Generative Search

Generative AI is being increasingly integrated into search engines, but it has been criticized for producing content that sounds plausible yet is sometimes inaccurate. Little is currently known about the factors that prompt users to verify these responses. The study by Eva-Luise Knor, Michael V. Reiss, Judith Möller, and Lisa Merten addresses this knowledge gap.

Publikation Recently Published

Platforms, Online Surveillance, and the European Union: The Digital Services Act (DSA)

In their open-access article, Prof. Dr. Judith Möller, Ronan Ó Fathaigh, Bengi Zeybek, and Rocco Bellanova explore how the DSA facilitates public and private surveillance practices regarding content disseminated on online platforms.

Cover of issue 2/2026 M&K
Publikation Open Access Publication

M&K 2/2026 Has Been Published

The February 2026 issue of M&K features articles that explore the understanding of roles and the transformative potential of peripheral actors in the DACH region. Other articles examine developments in sports coverage in German daily newspapers from 2011 to 2021 and the usage patterns of ChatGPT, as well as anthropomorphic role attributions. You can download all of these articles free of charge.

Front Page of the Working Paper
Publikation Working Paper Available for Download

Babies and Toddlers in Family Influencing

In what ways and how often are babies and young children (ages 0–5) depicted on commercially oriented German-language social media profiles on Instagram, TikTok, and YouTube? Stephan Dreyer, Claudia Lampert, Kira Thiel, and others analyze this question using qualitative and quantitative methods. They also critically discuss the findings in light of the applicable legal framework and media ethics considerations.

Publikation Open Access Publication

Assessing Age Assurance Technologies: Effectiveness, Side-Effects, and Acceptance

In the article “Assessing Age Assurance Technologies: Effectiveness, Side-Effects, and Acceptance,” Dr. Wouter Lueks, Dr. Stephan Dreyer, Prof. Dr. Hannes Federrath, and Prof. Dr. Judith Simon analyze existing age verification methods.

1 2 3 14

Page 1 from 14

Newsletter

Information about current projects, events and publications of the institute.

Subscribe now