Coding Public Value – Public Service Media and Software for the Common Good

How can we develop software that is not only oriented towards business models, but also towards the common good, user interests, and media regulation? Coding Public Value (CPV) translates questions on media law, user orientation, and the integration of political and social stakeholders into approaches and methods for a responsible software engineering as well as institutional, political, and regulatory recommendations in the area of public service media libraries.

The project ‘Coding Public Value’ focuses on the development and evaluation of methods for responsible software engineering for the common good and corresponding institutional, political and organizational frameworks for public-service media platforms. How can legal, political and user-oriented requirements of public media be translated into requirements, methods and quality assessment practices for the engineering of software and which institutional, political, and organizational requirements have to be implemented in order to operate public service media platforms on the foundation of such public service-oriented software engineering?

The project combines science & technology studies, media and communication research, legal studies (this will be the task of the associated partner HBI), and empirical software engineering in an interdisciplinary collaboration.

The project will provide an analysis of stakeholders in the media sector, the media law and regulatory framework and of usage and market potentials. Furthermore, prototypical implementations are also planned.

Project Description

The Bavarian Research Institute for Digital Transformation (bidt) of the Bavarian Academy of Sciences and Humanities (BAdW) supports projects that investigate current issues of digital transformation and are interdisciplinary and cross-locational. Criteria for selection were high scientific quality, interdisciplinary access, and the social and political relevance of the proposed topics. Press Release of the bidt (in German): https://www.bidt.digital/bidt-foerdert-neun-forschungsprojekte-zur-digitalisierung/

The project contributes to society in three dimensions:

  • on a practical level, the project develops methods of public-interest oriented software engineering and prototypical implementations and thus contributes to the concretization of the social debate on alternative media and platform technologies in Europe;
  • on a political-regulatory level, the project develops recommendations for action and implementation and corresponding feasibility analyses that show political capacity for action beyond the regulation of digital technologies;
  • on a socio-public level, the project carries out co-design oriented stakeholder multilogs in order to involve public engagement in the development of technical and regulatory implementation proposals.

The project is designed to develop and evaluate media policy design options in the context of developing concrete technical implementations in prototypes and procedures.

The Leibniz Institute for Media Research is responsible for the media law work package: The core of the legal framework for the public broadcasters is the public programming mandate in Section 11 of the Interstate Broadcasting Treaty (RStV), in addition to the individual legal foundations for establishing the respective institution (e.g. BRG Act, SWR-StV). In the area of telemedia services, Sections 11d, 11f RStV also stipulate specific requirements and procedures that a new or modified online service from public broadcasters must undergo. The resulting service concepts contain a large number of specific and undefined concept requirements and voluntary commitments, which, however, generally relate to the content of the service.

The media law work package therefore presents the existing legal framework and identifies the current different content-related mission dimensions. They will be examined in terms of their application to content management and distribution, search and suggestion systems and filter technologies. Constitutional and simple-law dimensions of specific public-law offerings of this kind will be worked out. On the level of telemedia concepts, the available final telemedia concepts according to § 11f RStV will be analysed and those forms of self-regulation will be presented in aggregated form that refer to approaches and requirements for algorithmic selections.

The tasks in this work package lead to the presentation of the existing legal framework and questions of its applicability and concretisation in algorithmic procedures within telemedially provided offers in a systematic catalogue of requirements for corresponding systems. Positive requirements (diversity dimensions, balance, transparency) and negative limits (protection of personal rights, data protection, protection of minors in the media, responsibility for inadmissible statements by third parties, prohibition of press similarity, etc.) will be considered in a differentiated way.

In addition, the media law perspective is also incorporated into the further work packages of the cooperation partners: In the context of the creation of software prototypes, the media-law central question is how legal requirements and normative self-commitment can be efficiently transformed into software requirements (functional and non-functional)? Which structural framework conditions for current and future forms of regulation and their concretization are necessary for this?

Photo by Kelvyn Ornettte Sol Marte on Unsplash.

Project details

Overview

Start of the term: 2020; End of term: 2022

Research programme: RP 3 Knowledge for the Media Society

Contact person

Stephan Dreyer

Dr. Stephan Dreyer

Senior Researcher Media Law & Media Governance

Leibniz Institute for Media Research | Hans-Bredow-Institut (HBI)
Rothenbaumchaussee 36
20148 Hamburg
Germany

Similar projects & publications

Cover of the first volume of the EU publication series

The Protection of Freedom of Expression in the Digital Services Act

The publication "Der Schutz der Meinungsäusserungsfreiheit im Digital Services Act" [The Protection of Freedom of Expression in the Digital Services Act], to which Matthias C. Kettemann contributed significantly, is the first in a series of KommAustria publications on the DSA, which are intended to provide a basis for understanding the DSA and contribute to a more differentiated discussion.

Cover of Working Paper No. 76
Publikation Project Findings Available for Download

Between Curiosity and Skepticism: Use and Perception of Generative AI for Information Search in Germany

The research project "Generative Artificial Intelligence for Information Navigation", funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF), investigated to what extent, for what purposes and for what reasons the German population uses generative artificial intelligence in applications such as ChatGPT or Google Gemini. The findings can be downloaded as a working paper.

Cover of the 6/2025 issue of the New Journal of Administrative Law.
Publikation Article in Journal for Administrative Law

Trusted Flaggers Are Not Authorized Agents!

In the current issue of the Neue Zeitschrift für Verwaltungsrecht, Tobias Mast challenges the increasingly prominent view in legal literature that trusted flaggers under Art. 22 of the Digital Services Act (DSA) are public authorities in the sense of German administrative law.

Cover of the Publication
Publikation Education Study in Media Perspektiven

The Population’s View of ZDF’s Educational Function

A study on the educational mandate of the ZDF has for the first time examined the population's educational expectations and perceptions. Jan-Hinrik Schmidt, Uwe Hasebrink and Dieter Storll were involved in an advisory capacity in the design and evaluation of the study and have presented the core findings in detail in an article.

Auf schwarz-weißem Schachbrett stehen sich weiße und schwarze Figuren gegenüber
Projekt DAAD cooperation project

Mapping Polarization in News Media Content

How are polarizing topics reported in Germany and Australia – and does this reporting contribute to the polarization of political attitudes? The project examines how news content in both countries differs in its coverage of controversial issues – and whether this reporting contains potentially polarizing elements.

Cover of the Handbook Digital Journalism
Publikation Recently Published

Handbook of Digital Journalism

The second edition of the Routledge Companion to Digital Journalism Studies offers a collection of 54 essays addressing current issues and debates in the field of digital journalism studies, including two articles by Julius Reimer / Wiebke Loosen and Lisa Merten.

Cover von Heft 1/2025 der Zeitschrift M&K
Publikation Available Open Access

Issue 1/2025 of M&K Published

Issue 1/2025 of our journal Media & Communication Studies (M&K) has been published, including articles on journalism in Germany in 2023, on the role of Google and YouTube in the dissemination of conspiracy theories, and on journalistic role expectations and ideals of social coexistence in the German population. All content can be downloaded for free from the Nomos eLibrary.

Cover of the journal Computational Communication Research
Publikation Open Access Article

Data Donations from Journalism

In their article “I Really Thought I Would Use More Than Just Google: Investigating Professional Journalistic Online Use with Browser History Donations”, Lisa Merten, Felix Victor Münch and Maren Schuster describe how the method of data donation can be used to investigate professional media use in journalism. The article was published in the open access journal Computational Communication Research.

Cover des Nomos-Handbuchs Journalismusforschung
Publikation Recently Published

Journalism Research

A new Nomos Handbook, edited by Thomas Hanitzsch, Wiebke Loosen and Annika Sehl, offers an insight into the diversity of research on journalism in its social context. It looks, among other things, at actors, organisations and institutions, as well as at news, how it is produced and how it is used. The volume reflects the thematic, theoretical and methodological diversity of research.

Portrait Jan-Ole Harfst
Publikation Blog Post on Verfassungsblog

Elections in a Fortified Platform Democracy

The integrity of the German parliamentary elections and future European elections has been and continues to be threatened by influence peddling via social networks. The Digital Services Act (DSA) is supposed to provide a remedy against election manipulation. In a blog post on the Verfassungsblog, Jan-Ole Harfst explains why Art. 34-35 of the DSA could hardly remedy the systemic risks of this federal election campaign.

1 2 3 8

Page 1 from 8

Newsletter

Information about current projects, events and publications of the institute.

Subscribe now