Labeling of Edited (Influencer) Photos: Necessity, Conditions for Effectiveness, Regulatory Approaches

Must, should, may digitally edited photos in social media be labeled? On behalf of the Commission for the Protection of Minors in the Media (KJM), the HBI is investigating the necessity of a legal labeling requirement for edited photos and videos.

In view of the potential negative effects of manipulated images on body image, especially among young people, an interdisciplinary team at the HBI is analyzing the current state of research on the effects, the experiences with existing regulations in other countries (Israel, France and Norway) and identifying the requirements for effective labeling. If necessary, the interdisciplinary project team will develop a proposal for an appropriate legal regulation in Germany based on the findings.

The expert opnion is intended to provide political decision-makers with a sound basis for possible regulatory measures in digital image manipulation.

Background and Expert Questions

The ongoing digitalization and the rise of social media have fundamentally changed the way we use media and interact with each other. In particular, the rapid rise of platforms such as Instagram or TikTok has led to a significant increase in visual content in the form of user-generated photos and short videos, which are often edited or retouched. This is partly because the platforms themselves offer low-threshold options for using effects and filters. Many creators, influencers, celebrities and even ordinary users edit their photos to present an idealized image of themselves. While in some cases this can be understood as artistic expression or marketing strategy, retouched representations pose potential risks for individuals, groups of people and society as a whole.

Where social media acts as a (new) socialization instance and where representations of appearance, self-presentation and gender roles are (particularly) relevant for children and young people, ubiquitous edited photos can convey unrealistic beauty ideals. Adolescents and older children who are in the process of developing their identity are particularly susceptible to visual messages conveyed by idolized people in social media, especially in view of the feedback culture there, with likes and comments that reinforce and perpetuate supposed beauty ideals. At the same time, they are often unable to recognize the discrepancy between the retouched images and reality, which can lead to a distorted self-image and image of others. The pressure to conform to a certain appearance can lead to low self-esteem, body dissatisfaction and consequential problems such as eating disorders or the desire for cosmetic surgery.

The increasing use of applications of generative artificial intelligence (AI) further intensifies the problem. AI technologies not only make it possible to retouch images, but also to create them entirely artificially. This makes it even more difficult to distinguish between authentic and manipulated images. The increasing use of such technologies in media production can lead to the boundaries between reality and fiction becoming even more difficult to determine.

In this context, the necessity of a legal requirement to label edited photos and videos is being discussed. The idea is that such a requirement could help to create transparency and awareness on the part of recipients, thus ideally reducing the potential for harm inherent in retouched images. Several countries already have such regulations in place, including Israel (2013), France (2019) and Norway (2021). These new regulatory frameworks are discussed under the term “body image laws”.

At the same time, the question arises as to how such a labeling requirement can be implemented effectively and practically without disproportionately restricting artistic freedoms, freedom of expression or commercial interests.

Project details

Overview

Start of the term: 2024; End of term: 2024

Research programme: RP 3 Knowledge for the Media Society

Area of competence:

Competence Area Growing Up in Digital Media Environments

Contact person

Stephan Dreyer

Dr. Stephan Dreyer

Senior Researcher Media Law & Media Governance

Leibniz Institute for Media Research | Hans-Bredow-Institut (HBI)
Rothenbaumchaussee 36
20148 Hamburg
Germany

Similar projects & publications

Bild des 1600 Seiten starken Kommnatrs
Publikation The most comprehensive HBI publication ever!

DSA DMA Commentary

It is the most extensive publication the HBI has ever produced: the 1600-page commentary on the Digital Services Act (DSA) and the Digital Markets Act (DMA), edited by Tobias Mast, Matthias C. Kettemann, Stephan Dreyer and Wolfgang Schulz. In addition to several current and former researchers from the institute, almost 30 other experts from Germany, Austria and Switzerland were recruited for the commentary project.

Cover des Kurzgutachtens
Publikation Brief Expert Opinion

State Treaty on the Reform of the Procedure for Setting the Broadcasting License Fee

Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Schulz and Dr. Tobias Mast have provided their expert opinion on the State Treaty on the Reform of the Procedure for Setting the Broadcasting Fee (RFinÄStV). At the end of 2004, the federal states had decided to separate the pillars of the reform of public broadcasting and to adopt the draft reform first and to continue the process of reforming the procedure for setting the licence fee separately.

Cover of the first volume of the EU publication series

The Protection of Freedom of Expression in the Digital Services Act

The publication "Der Schutz der Meinungsäusserungsfreiheit im Digital Services Act" [The Protection of Freedom of Expression in the Digital Services Act], to which Matthias C. Kettemann contributed significantly, is the first in a series of KommAustria publications on the DSA, which are intended to provide a basis for understanding the DSA and contribute to a more differentiated discussion.

Cover of Working Paper No. 76
Publikation Project Findings Available for Download

Between Curiosity and Skepticism: Use and Perception of Generative AI for Information Search in Germany

The research project "Generative Artificial Intelligence for Information Navigation", funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF), investigated to what extent, for what purposes and for what reasons the German population uses generative artificial intelligence in applications such as ChatGPT or Google Gemini. The findings can be downloaded as a working paper.

Cover of the 6/2025 issue of the New Journal of Administrative Law.
Publikation Article in Journal for Administrative Law

Trusted Flaggers Are Not Authorized Agents!

In the current issue of the Neue Zeitschrift für Verwaltungsrecht, Tobias Mast challenges the increasingly prominent view in legal literature that trusted flaggers under Art. 22 of the Digital Services Act (DSA) are public authorities in the sense of German administrative law.

Cover of the Publication
Publikation Education Study in Media Perspektiven

The Population’s View of ZDF’s Educational Function

A study on the educational mandate of the ZDF has for the first time examined the population's educational expectations and perceptions. Jan-Hinrik Schmidt, Uwe Hasebrink and Dieter Storll were involved in an advisory capacity in the design and evaluation of the study and have presented the core findings in detail in an article.

Auf schwarz-weißem Schachbrett stehen sich weiße und schwarze Figuren gegenüber
Projekt DAAD cooperation project

Mapping Polarization in News Media Content

How are polarizing topics reported in Germany and Australia – and does this reporting contribute to the polarization of political attitudes? The project examines how news content in both countries differs in its coverage of controversial issues – and whether this reporting contains potentially polarizing elements.

Cover of the Handbook Digital Journalism
Publikation Recently Published

Handbook of Digital Journalism

The second edition of the Routledge Companion to Digital Journalism Studies offers a collection of 54 essays addressing current issues and debates in the field of digital journalism studies, including two articles by Julius Reimer / Wiebke Loosen and Lisa Merten.

Cover von Heft 1/2025 der Zeitschrift M&K
Publikation Available Open Access

Issue 1/2025 of M&K Published

Issue 1/2025 of our journal Media & Communication Studies (M&K) has been published, including articles on journalism in Germany in 2023, on the role of Google and YouTube in the dissemination of conspiracy theories, and on journalistic role expectations and ideals of social coexistence in the German population. All content can be downloaded for free from the Nomos eLibrary.

Cover of the journal Computational Communication Research
Publikation Open Access Article

Data Donations from Journalism

In their article “I Really Thought I Would Use More Than Just Google: Investigating Professional Journalistic Online Use with Browser History Donations”, Lisa Merten, Felix Victor Münch and Maren Schuster describe how the method of data donation can be used to investigate professional media use in journalism. The article was published in the open access journal Computational Communication Research.

1 2 3 8

Page 1 from 8

Newsletter

Information about current projects, events and publications of the institute.

Subscribe now