Labeling of Edited (Influencer) Photos: Necessity, Conditions for Effectiveness, Regulatory Approaches

Must, should, may digitally edited photos in social media be labeled? On behalf of the Commission for the Protection of Minors in the Media (KJM), the HBI is investigating the necessity of a legal labeling requirement for edited photos and videos.

In view of the potential negative effects of manipulated images on body image, especially among young people, an interdisciplinary team at the HBI is analyzing the current state of research on the effects, the experiences with existing regulations in other countries (Israel, France and Norway) and identifying the requirements for effective labeling. If necessary, the interdisciplinary project team will develop a proposal for an appropriate legal regulation in Germany based on the findings.

The expert opnion is intended to provide political decision-makers with a sound basis for possible regulatory measures in digital image manipulation.

Background and Expert Questions

The ongoing digitalization and the rise of social media have fundamentally changed the way we use media and interact with each other. In particular, the rapid rise of platforms such as Instagram or TikTok has led to a significant increase in visual content in the form of user-generated photos and short videos, which are often edited or retouched. This is partly because the platforms themselves offer low-threshold options for using effects and filters. Many creators, influencers, celebrities and even ordinary users edit their photos to present an idealized image of themselves. While in some cases this can be understood as artistic expression or marketing strategy, retouched representations pose potential risks for individuals, groups of people and society as a whole.

Where social media acts as a (new) socialization instance and where representations of appearance, self-presentation and gender roles are (particularly) relevant for children and young people, ubiquitous edited photos can convey unrealistic beauty ideals. Adolescents and older children who are in the process of developing their identity are particularly susceptible to visual messages conveyed by idolized people in social media, especially in view of the feedback culture there, with likes and comments that reinforce and perpetuate supposed beauty ideals. At the same time, they are often unable to recognize the discrepancy between the retouched images and reality, which can lead to a distorted self-image and image of others. The pressure to conform to a certain appearance can lead to low self-esteem, body dissatisfaction and consequential problems such as eating disorders or the desire for cosmetic surgery.

The increasing use of applications of generative artificial intelligence (AI) further intensifies the problem. AI technologies not only make it possible to retouch images, but also to create them entirely artificially. This makes it even more difficult to distinguish between authentic and manipulated images. The increasing use of such technologies in media production can lead to the boundaries between reality and fiction becoming even more difficult to determine.

In this context, the necessity of a legal requirement to label edited photos and videos is being discussed. The idea is that such a requirement could help to create transparency and awareness on the part of recipients, thus ideally reducing the potential for harm inherent in retouched images. Several countries already have such regulations in place, including Israel (2013), France (2019) and Norway (2021). These new regulatory frameworks are discussed under the term “body image laws”.

At the same time, the question arises as to how such a labeling requirement can be implemented effectively and practically without disproportionately restricting artistic freedoms, freedom of expression or commercial interests.

Project details

Overview

Start of the term: 2024; End of term: 2024

Research programme: RP 3 Knowledge for the Media Society

Area of competence:

Competence Area Growing Up in Digital Media Environments

Contact person

Stephan Dreyer

Dr. Stephan Dreyer

Senior Researcher Media Law & Media Governance

Leibniz Institute for Media Research | Hans-Bredow-Institut
Warburgstraße 30b
20354 Hamburg

Similar projects & publications

Publikation Review of a Dissertation

Government Public Relations in New Media

For years, the democratic legitimacy of government public relations has been a topic of discussion in academic literature and constitutional jurisprudence. Tobias Mast reviews a recently published dissertation on the subject, exploring the untapped potential of interdisciplinary legal scholarship in relation to commonly accepted empirical assumptions.

Publikation Article for Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung

Platform Badges for Civic Communication

Digital platforms have become central infrastructures for political communication and social negotiation processes. In his article, Jan Rau examines platform badges, which are tools that platforms use to fulfill their obligation to mitigate risk by creating positive incentives for users to adhere to certain communicative norms.

Cover des Arbeitspapiers
Publikation Working Paper for Download

Responsibility in the Platform Quadrangle

This working paper by Tobias Mast comments on the European Court of Justice's recent Russmedia ruling and sets out the premises for a relationship between EU legal acts in the digital single market that respects fundamental rights.

ein Kabel führt in ein Smartphone
Projekt Project with Helmut Schmidt University

Data Collection and Analysis on TikTok and YouTube

In order to develop the best practices for collecting and analyzing data on short video platforms, Gregor Wiedemann's Media Research Methods Lab at the HBI is participating in a Helmut Schmidt University project examining the German Armed Forces' representation on TikTok and YouTube.

Eine Fernbedienung zeigt auf einen Bildschirm mit unscharfen bunten Bildern
Projekt International Cooperation Project

Euromedia Ownership Monitor

The Euromedia Ownership Monitor provides policymakers and the general public with in-depth insights into the extent of media ownership transparency in the EU. It was updated in 2025.

Cover of the special issue on datafication, 1/2026, M&K
Publikation M&K Issue 1/2026 Published Open Access

On the Datafication of Communication

The special issue of M&K titled "The Datafication of Communication: New Methodological Approaches and Challenges" has been published as Issue 1/2026. The guest editors are Julia Niemann-Lenz, Tim Schatto-Eckrodt, Emese Domahidi, and Merja Mahrt.

Cover of the book
Publikation Article Published in Handbook

Growing Up in Data-Intensive and Automated (Media) Environments

Dr. Claudia Lampert examines changing usage practices and possible implications for socialization research in the chapter “Growing Up in Data-Intensive and Automated (Media) Environments” of the handbook “Media Socialization in ‘Smart’ Environments. Self- and Social Development in the Context of Datafication and Automation,” edited by Laura Sūna and Wolfgang Reißmann.

Cover of the report “Generative AI from the Perspective of Young People”
Publikation Publication on Safer Internet Day 2026

Generative AI from the Perspective of Young People

The use of generative AI, especially ChatGPT, is now firmly established among young people online. A study by Kira Thiel, Claudia Lampert and Eleysa Memis explores young people's views on generative AI, highlighting its significance in their daily lives.

Cover des Arbeitspapiers
Publikation Working Paper Available for Download

Public Service Media Enabling Dialogue

For the project “Dialog Formats in Public Service Media,” Magdalena Stratmann conducted a literature analysis on “The Role of Public Service Media as Enablers of Dialogue in Digitalized Societies.” This analysis is now available for download as a working paper.

Vorschau des Artikels von Christian Ollig auf epd Medien
Publikation Article for epd Medien

How the Digital Services Act (DSA) Regulates Platforms

U.S. politicians accuse the European Union of endangering freedom of expression with the Digital Services Act (DSA). However, media law expert Dr. Christian Ollig argues that the DSA actually protects users' opinions from arbitrary censorship by platform operators. It also gives users a legal basis to assert their freedom of expression against large platform operators at the European level.

1 2 3 13

Page 1 from 13

Newsletter

Information about current projects, events and publications of the institute.

Subscribe now