Labeling of Edited (Influencer) Photos: Necessity, Conditions for Effectiveness, Regulatory Approaches

Must, should, may digitally edited photos in social media be labeled? On behalf of the Commission for the Protection of Minors in the Media (KJM), the HBI is investigating the necessity of a legal labeling requirement for edited photos and videos.

In view of the potential negative effects of manipulated images on body image, especially among young people, an interdisciplinary team at the HBI is analyzing the current state of research on the effects, the experiences with existing regulations in other countries (Israel, France and Norway) and identifying the requirements for effective labeling. If necessary, the interdisciplinary project team will develop a proposal for an appropriate legal regulation in Germany based on the findings.

The expert opnion is intended to provide political decision-makers with a sound basis for possible regulatory measures in digital image manipulation.

Background and Expert Questions

The ongoing digitalization and the rise of social media have fundamentally changed the way we use media and interact with each other. In particular, the rapid rise of platforms such as Instagram or TikTok has led to a significant increase in visual content in the form of user-generated photos and short videos, which are often edited or retouched. This is partly because the platforms themselves offer low-threshold options for using effects and filters. Many creators, influencers, celebrities and even ordinary users edit their photos to present an idealized image of themselves. While in some cases this can be understood as artistic expression or marketing strategy, retouched representations pose potential risks for individuals, groups of people and society as a whole.

Where social media acts as a (new) socialization instance and where representations of appearance, self-presentation and gender roles are (particularly) relevant for children and young people, ubiquitous edited photos can convey unrealistic beauty ideals. Adolescents and older children who are in the process of developing their identity are particularly susceptible to visual messages conveyed by idolized people in social media, especially in view of the feedback culture there, with likes and comments that reinforce and perpetuate supposed beauty ideals. At the same time, they are often unable to recognize the discrepancy between the retouched images and reality, which can lead to a distorted self-image and image of others. The pressure to conform to a certain appearance can lead to low self-esteem, body dissatisfaction and consequential problems such as eating disorders or the desire for cosmetic surgery.

The increasing use of applications of generative artificial intelligence (AI) further intensifies the problem. AI technologies not only make it possible to retouch images, but also to create them entirely artificially. This makes it even more difficult to distinguish between authentic and manipulated images. The increasing use of such technologies in media production can lead to the boundaries between reality and fiction becoming even more difficult to determine.

In this context, the necessity of a legal requirement to label edited photos and videos is being discussed. The idea is that such a requirement could help to create transparency and awareness on the part of recipients, thus ideally reducing the potential for harm inherent in retouched images. Several countries already have such regulations in place, including Israel (2013), France (2019) and Norway (2021). These new regulatory frameworks are discussed under the term “body image laws”.

At the same time, the question arises as to how such a labeling requirement can be implemented effectively and practically without disproportionately restricting artistic freedoms, freedom of expression or commercial interests.

Project details

Overview

Start of the term: 2024; End of term: 2024

Research programme: RP 3 Knowledge for the Media Society

Area of competence:

Competence Area Growing Up in Digital Media Environments

Contact person

Stephan Dreyer

Dr. Stephan Dreyer

Senior Researcher Media Law & Media Governance

We are no longer located at Rothenbaumchaussee 36. You can reach us temporarely at the following address:

Leibniz Institute for Media Research, Hans-Bredow-Institut
c/o betahaus | Gänsemarkt
Gänsemarkt 43
20354 Hamburg

Similar projects & publications

Cover des Buchs "Recht der Digitalisierung"
Publikation Available Open Access

Law of Digitalization

Can the right legal framework meet the central challenges of digitization? This volume, edited by Prof. Dr. Matthias C. Kettemann, explores important new areas of law, the regulation of AI, the role of digital services, and the characteristics of effective technology policy and sensible innovation law.

Screenshot der ersten "Seite" des Artikels auf dem Verfassungsblog
Publikation Article on Verfassungsblog

DSA Enforcement by the EU Commission

The problematic role of the European Commission in enforcing the Digital Services Act (DSA) and possible alternatives are the focus of a blog post published by Jan-Ole Harfst, Dr. Tobias Mast, and Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Schulz on 16 July 2025 on the Verfassungblog.

Cover der Zeitschrift
Publikation Recently Published

Community Data Trust for Sensitive Data

Jan Rau, Moritz Fürneisen, and Gregor Wiedemann co-developed the concept of community data stewardship to facilitate the collaborative creation and utilization of sensitive data in communication science. By using the example of research into right-wing extremist online communication, they demonstrate how community data stewardship can be structured.

Cover der Zeitschrift UFITA
Publikation Recently Published

On the Public Value of Public Service Media

"What Can Audience Research findings tell us about the public value of public service media?" This question explored by Prof. Dr. Uwe Hasebrink and PD Dr. Jan-Hinrik Schmidt, who published their insights in the issue 2/2024 of the journal UFITA.

Cover der Broschüre zum 75. Geburtstag
Publikation Brochure Available for Download

Facets of 75 Years Hans-Bredow-Institut

With this brochure. we take a look at the institute's development since 1950. While we do not claim to provide a complete history, we aim to highlight some of the institute's unique characteristics, showcasing moments in the past when these features were particularly evident.

Cover von Heft 2/2025 M&K
Publikation Recently Published

M&K 2/2025 Special Issue “Media Structures Revisited”

Issue 2/2025 of Media & Communication Science has been published as a special issue entitled “Media Structures Revisited,” edited by Josef Seethaler, Marlis Prinzing, Petra Herczeg, and Mark Eisenegger. The entire issue is available open access via the Nomos eLibrary.

Cover der Publikation "
Publikation Research Project on Misinformation and Disinformation

Destructive Discourses

The final research report, jointly written as part of the NOTORIOUS research project, looks at how climate-related misinformation and disinformation spreads across different platforms. At the HBI, Philipp Keßling, Dr. Felix Victor Münch, Dr. Gregor Wiedemann, and Mattes Ruckdeschel worked on the report.

Bild des 1600 Seiten starken Kommnatrs
Publikation The most comprehensive HBI publication ever!

DSA DMA Commentary

It is the most extensive publication the HBI has ever produced: the 1600-page commentary on the Digital Services Act (DSA) and the Digital Markets Act (DMA), edited by Tobias Mast, Matthias C. Kettemann, Stephan Dreyer and Wolfgang Schulz. In addition to several current and former researchers from the institute, almost 30 other experts from Germany, Austria and Switzerland were recruited for the commentary project.

Cover des Kurzgutachtens
Publikation Brief Expert Opinion

State Treaty on the Reform of the Procedure for Setting the Broadcasting License Fee

Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Schulz and Dr. Tobias Mast have provided their expert opinion on the State Treaty on the Reform of the Procedure for Setting the Broadcasting Fee (RFinÄStV). At the end of 2004, the federal states had decided to separate the pillars of the reform of public broadcasting and to adopt the draft reform first and to continue the process of reforming the procedure for setting the licence fee separately.

Cover of the first volume of the EU publication series

The Protection of Freedom of Expression in the Digital Services Act

The publication "Der Schutz der Meinungsäusserungsfreiheit im Digital Services Act" [The Protection of Freedom of Expression in the Digital Services Act], to which Matthias C. Kettemann contributed significantly, is the first in a series of KommAustria publications on the DSA, which are intended to provide a basis for understanding the DSA and contribute to a more differentiated discussion.

1 2 3 9

Page 1 from 9

Newsletter

Information about current projects, events and publications of the institute.

Subscribe now