Labeling of Edited (Influencer) Photos: Necessity, Conditions for Effectiveness, Regulatory Approaches

Must, should, may digitally edited photos in social media be labeled? On behalf of the Commission for the Protection of Minors in the Media (KJM), the HBI is investigating the necessity of a legal labeling requirement for edited photos and videos.

In view of the potential negative effects of manipulated images on body image, especially among young people, an interdisciplinary team at the HBI is analyzing the current state of research on the effects, the experiences with existing regulations in other countries (Israel, France and Norway) and identifying the requirements for effective labeling. If necessary, the interdisciplinary project team will develop a proposal for an appropriate legal regulation in Germany based on the findings.

The expert opnion is intended to provide political decision-makers with a sound basis for possible regulatory measures in digital image manipulation.

Background and Expert Questions

The ongoing digitalization and the rise of social media have fundamentally changed the way we use media and interact with each other. In particular, the rapid rise of platforms such as Instagram or TikTok has led to a significant increase in visual content in the form of user-generated photos and short videos, which are often edited or retouched. This is partly because the platforms themselves offer low-threshold options for using effects and filters. Many creators, influencers, celebrities and even ordinary users edit their photos to present an idealized image of themselves. While in some cases this can be understood as artistic expression or marketing strategy, retouched representations pose potential risks for individuals, groups of people and society as a whole.

Where social media acts as a (new) socialization instance and where representations of appearance, self-presentation and gender roles are (particularly) relevant for children and young people, ubiquitous edited photos can convey unrealistic beauty ideals. Adolescents and older children who are in the process of developing their identity are particularly susceptible to visual messages conveyed by idolized people in social media, especially in view of the feedback culture there, with likes and comments that reinforce and perpetuate supposed beauty ideals. At the same time, they are often unable to recognize the discrepancy between the retouched images and reality, which can lead to a distorted self-image and image of others. The pressure to conform to a certain appearance can lead to low self-esteem, body dissatisfaction and consequential problems such as eating disorders or the desire for cosmetic surgery.

The increasing use of applications of generative artificial intelligence (AI) further intensifies the problem. AI technologies not only make it possible to retouch images, but also to create them entirely artificially. This makes it even more difficult to distinguish between authentic and manipulated images. The increasing use of such technologies in media production can lead to the boundaries between reality and fiction becoming even more difficult to determine.

In this context, the necessity of a legal requirement to label edited photos and videos is being discussed. The idea is that such a requirement could help to create transparency and awareness on the part of recipients, thus ideally reducing the potential for harm inherent in retouched images. Several countries already have such regulations in place, including Israel (2013), France (2019) and Norway (2021). These new regulatory frameworks are discussed under the term “body image laws”.

At the same time, the question arises as to how such a labeling requirement can be implemented effectively and practically without disproportionately restricting artistic freedoms, freedom of expression or commercial interests.

Project details

Overview

Start of the term: 2024; End of term: 2024

Research programme: RP 3 Knowledge for the Media Society

Area of competence:

Competence Area Growing Up in Digital Media Environments

Contact person

Portrait von Stephan Dreyer

Dr. Stephan Dreyer

Senior Researcher Media Law & Media Governance

Leibniz Institute for Media Research | Hans-Bredow-Institut
Warburgstraße 30b
20354 Hamburg

Similar projects & publications

Publikation Recently Published

Visualizing Regulatory Ecosystems: The AI Act as a Case Study

The article by Magdalena Stratmann, Tobias Mast, and others was developed as part of the STEAM project, "Informing Regulatory Reasoning on Algorithmic Systems in Societal Communication with STEAM." It introduces Architectural Ecosystem Modeling, a visual method that makes the institutional structures of the AI Act visible. This method analyzes responsibilities and dependencies and identifies gaps, overlaps, and opportunities for coordination within the regulatory framework.

eine Frau hinter einem Tisch mit ablehnender Haltung gegenüber Zeitungen auf dem Tisch.
Projekt New Project!

Practices of News Avoidance and Their Implications for Public Connection

What are the effects of news avoidance on belonging to different publics and on political participation? And to what extent do these dynamics contribute to the fragmentation of public spheres? This study examines the effects of different practices of news avoidance on individuals‘ public connection.

Projekt BMFTR Project

Podcasts: Actors, Topics, and Misinformation

As audio media, such as podcasts, become more widely used, the risks of them distributing misinformation, disinformation, and fake news increase. The collaborative project “Systematic Observation of New Auditive Risks” (SONAR) examines the structure of online audio media offerings and develops methods for identifying relevant narratives and manipulation strategies.

Publikation Merz issue and Podcast Available!

Thoughts on the Debate Over Media Bans

Dr. Claudia Lampert, together with Klaus Lutz (Parabol Media Center), edited the latest issue of the media education journal “merz” (2/2026). The issue is titled “Everything Under Control? Thoughts on the Debate Over Media Bans.” Dr. Stephan Dreyer also contributed an article.

Publikation Available for Download

Annual Report 2023-2025

Evaluation, growth, our 75th anniversary, and a new building. The years from 2023 to 2025 were challenging yet fruitful. Our research output was impressive, and our social impact was significant. This annual report provides a brief overview of our activities.

Publikation Open Access Publication

Determinants of Verification Behavior in Generative Search

Generative AI is being increasingly integrated into search engines, but it has been criticized for producing content that sounds plausible yet is sometimes inaccurate. Little is currently known about the factors that prompt users to verify these responses. The study by Eva-Luise Knor, Michael V. Reiss, Judith Möller, and Lisa Merten addresses this knowledge gap.

Publikation Recently Published

Platforms, Online Surveillance, and the European Union: The Digital Services Act (DSA)

In their open-access article, Prof. Dr. Judith Möller, Ronan Ó Fathaigh, Bengi Zeybek, and Rocco Bellanova explore how the DSA facilitates public and private surveillance practices regarding content disseminated on online platforms.

Cover of issue 2/2026 M&K
Publikation Open Access Publication

M&K 2/2026 Has Been Published

The February 2026 issue of M&K features articles that explore the understanding of roles and the transformative potential of peripheral actors in the DACH region. Other articles examine developments in sports coverage in German daily newspapers from 2011 to 2021 and the usage patterns of ChatGPT, as well as anthropomorphic role attributions. You can download all of these articles free of charge.

Front Page of the Working Paper
Publikation Working Paper Available for Download

Babies and Toddlers in Family Influencing

In what ways and how often are babies and young children (ages 0–5) depicted on commercially oriented German-language social media profiles on Instagram, TikTok, and YouTube? Stephan Dreyer, Claudia Lampert, Kira Thiel, and others analyze this question using qualitative and quantitative methods. They also critically discuss the findings in light of the applicable legal framework and media ethics considerations.

Publikation Open Access Publication

Assessing Age Assurance Technologies: Effectiveness, Side-Effects, and Acceptance

In the article “Assessing Age Assurance Technologies: Effectiveness, Side-Effects, and Acceptance,” Dr. Wouter Lueks, Dr. Stephan Dreyer, Prof. Dr. Hannes Federrath, and Prof. Dr. Judith Simon analyze existing age verification methods.

1 2 3 14

Page 1 from 14

Newsletter

Information about current projects, events and publications of the institute.

Subscribe now