Software Systems, the Public and Participation

Nowadays, digital media play a significant role in public participation. What features of software systems influence the actions of users and in what way? And what communicative figurations of providers, developers and users decide on the design of these features?

Digital media make it easier to be informed about and participate in socially relevant topics. They do not only open up new possibilities for actions but also frame the practices of users in their own way. Data structures, algorithms, preferences and interfaces are inscribed within the “code”, meaning the underlying software systems. These inscriptions influence the users’ actions and their consequences: what options do data fields offer to an individual profile page on a social media platform in order to express political preferences? How narrow or diverse are information worlds with their outputs of recommendation and search algorithms? What forms of circulation and data processing support open interfaces and APIs?

These questions demonstrate that the form of software systems shape society and public participation. However, the form itself is also a result of social practices in software companies, development departments in organisations, open-source-communities or the like. In other words, it is always the specific constellations of actors with own communicative practices that design models of a social reality and translate it in “running code”.

Objective of the Project

The objective of this project is to develop an access in communications sociology to the relationship between software systems, the public and participation. Firstly, this includes the development of compatible categories relevant for social sciences for the description of software systems in order to illustrate and explain its shaping power. Secondly, we examine the social influence of software systems in communicative figurations of their providers, developers and users.

Picture: Rob Hampson on unsplash.com

Project details

Overview

Start of the term: 2015; End of term: 2037

Persons involved

Contact person

Jan-Hinrik Schmidt

PD Dr. Jan-Hinrik Schmidt

Senior Postdoc Digital Interactive Media and Political Communication

Leibniz Institute for Media Research, Hans-Bredow-Institut
Warburgstraße 30b
20354 Hamburg

Similar projects & publications

Publikation Internet Policy Review

Can Quality Badges Improve Communication on Online Platforms?

A seal of approval for civil communication could promote successful public communication on online platforms while respecting users'freedoms. In their article 'Platform Badges for Civic Communication. An Interdisciplinary Discussion of a Risk Mitigation Measure Pursuant to Art.', Jan Rau, Jan-Ole Harfst and Dr. Tobias Mast examine various design options for such seals.

Cover of the publication
Publikation Open Access Publication

Global Media and Internet Concentration

The report offers a thorough overview of the development, economic importance, and market concentration of major companies in Germany's telecommunications, media, publishing, and internet sectors from 2019 to 2023. It places a particular focus on the growing dominance of digital platforms.

Cover der Zeitschrift "Medien & Kommunikationswissenschaft" Heft 4/2025
Publikation Available Open Access

Issue 4/2025 M&K published

Issue 4/2025 of our open access journal “Medien & Kommunikationswissenschaft" (M&K; Media & Communication Studies) has been published online via the platform Inlibra.

Cover of the Book Chapter
Publikation Chapter in Cohesion Report

The Climate Discourse on Social Media

The Social Media Observatory (SMO) examined the dynamics of climate discourse on social media for the Research Institute Social Cohesion's (RISC) second cohesion report. The study found that climate scepticism and misinformation are common in social media debates. However, it is evident that these views are significantly less prevalent in wider society.

The cover of the article "Fertility Preservation from the Patient's Perspective: Areas of Conflict and Information Needs in Social Media," published in the journal Die Onkologie
Publikation Article in the Journal Onkologie

Perspectives of Cancer Patients on Fertility Preservation Measures

Fertility preservation is a key challenge for cancer patients. A qualitative content analysis of social media posts offers insights into patient experiences and provides guidance for needs-based fertility counseling.

Cover of the Working Paper
Publikation Working Paper Available for Download

Algorithmic Competence of Young People on TikTok

A new qualitative #UseTheNews study by the Leibniz Institute for Media Research examines what teenagers and young adults know about how TikTok's algorithmic recommendation system works.

Cover of the publication
Publikation Open Access Publication

Information Systems and Troubled Democracy

Internet freedom has declined for 14 consecutive years. This publication examines how principles for regulating information ecosystems are being implemented, as well as the challenges faced by public institutions and other stakeholders in their efforts to combat misinformation and disinformation.

Screenshot of the article by Dr. Gregor Wiedemann, AVISO, issue no. 81 (Fall 2025)
Publikation Article in aviso I Informationsdienst der DGPuK

AI and Research: Harnessing Potential, Understanding Risks

In his contribution, Gregor Wiedemann highlights the ambivalences that can arise from the use of AI tools in communication science research processes, as well as the necessity of precise risk assessment in this context.

Screenshot of an article on the Verfassungsblog. Title of the article: “Ein rundfunkrechtliches ‘Solange’?” [An “As Long As" in Broadcasting Law?]
Publikation Article on Verfassungsblog

An “As Long As” in Broadcasting Law?

In an article, Dr. Tobias Mast and Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Schulz discuss the Federal Constitutional Court's decision on the constitutionality of the broadcasting license fee. Their analysis is based on the press release published by the Federal Administrative Court on October 15, 2025.

Cover of an expert opinion by Dr. Stephan Dreyer on the AI Regulation and children's rights
Publikation German Children's Fund

Expert Opinion on Children’s Rights and Artificial Intelligence (AI)

In his expert opinion, "The AI Regulation, Its Relationship to Children’s Rights in the Digital Space, and Options for Advocacy Approaches," media lawyer Stephan Dreyer examines how the children’s rights enshrined in the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights are addressed in the regulation.

1 2 3 12

Page 1 from 12

Newsletter

Information about current projects, events and publications of the institute.

Subscribe now