Media Use and Social Cohesion

How do people in different social situations use different kind of media? And how do they contribute to the creation of public spheres and social cohesion?

The project, which is a Hamburg subproject of the Research Institute Social Cohesion (RISC), uses various empirical data to determine how subgroups of society relate to each other in terms of communication. Thus, it is possible to identify communication and media-related processes of social integration and fragmentation. Furthermore, we reflect on the findings from a media law perspective and examine them with regard to their consequences for (constitutional) media law and media policy.

The project is based on the assumption that the way people use different communication media and thereby relate to different publics, groups and individuals is a decisive factor in the construction of social cohesion. Considering the permeable borders between public and private communication, the idea of a person’s social integration being reflected in his or her personal networks, on the one hand, and his or her participation in public communication through the reception of mass media, on the other hand, is outdated. If we want to understand the contribution of individual media users to the construction of social cohesion in today’s media environment, we need a more differentiated analysis of the practices by which individuals relate to different public spheres. The analysis of individual “repertoires of public connection” can also serve as a conceptual bridge to the description of public spheres and the analysis of their cohesion.

Thus, the project will focus particularly on (media-related) practices and the interwoven networks of relationships as decisive factors that create social cohesion. It aims to contribute to a better understanding of social cohesion, both in terms of conceptual theory and empirical analysis.

Methods, Empirical Approach, Procedure

To answer the key question, the project combines several disciplinary perspectives and different methodological approaches in six work packages:

  • In two work packages we will re-analyse data sets from two international comparative quantitative surveys conducted elsewhere, focusing on the question of the implications of changing patterns of media use for social cohesion.
    • Based on the data on media use in Germany, the USA and China, among others, collected in 2018 as part of the project “The Peoples’ Internet (PIN)”, it is possible to investigate how much population groups differ in their communication behaviour, their sense of belonging, social participation and life satisfaction.
    • The “Reuters Institute Digital News Survey (RDNS)” is an annual comparative study of news usage in 38 countries, which has been conducted since 2012. The re-analysis of the data sets will shed light on patterns of news usage, trust in reporting, the role of social media and general participation behaviour. The data will be put into perspective both in a country comparison and in a longitudinal perspective.
  • A third work package includes studies of emerging practices in dealing with digital platforms. The data collected in the (Social) Media Observatory will be examined with regard to individual practices of social media use and their implications for social cohesion. This will include network analyses to identify audience overlaps and automated content analyses of user reactions and comments.
  • In a fourth work package, we will use data from the centrally conducted quantitative and qualitative panel studies of the RISC and focus on the role of media and communication. Which patterns of media use can be observed in which social milieus? And how are these related to different indicators of social cohesion?
  • In addition to and building on the empirical work, a fifth work package will reflect and classify the findings of communication science from a legal perspective. In particular, we will discuss the extent to which empirically observable changes in social cohesion can be taken into account by the legislature regulating the media and how far they can still be harmonised with the concepts set out by the Federal Constitutional Court, such as that of a deliberative media democracy.
  • A sixth work package focuses on the integration of the findings from previous steps and a summary analysis.

Project details

Overview

Start of the term: 2020; End of term: 2024

Research programme: RP 1 Transformation of Public Communication

Co-operation partners

  • Research Institutes within the Research Institute Social Cohesion

Contact person

Sascha Hölig

Dr. Sascha Hölig

Senior Researcher Media Usage

Leibniz Institute for Media Research | Hans-Bredow-Institut (HBI)
Rothenbaumchaussee 36
20148 Hamburg
Germany

Similar projects & publications

Cover des Buchs "Recht der Digitalisierung"
Publikation Available Open Access

Law of Digitalization

Can the right legal framework meet the central challenges of digitization? This volume, edited by Prof. Dr. Matthias C. Kettemann, explores important new areas of law, the regulation of AI, the role of digital services, and the characteristics of effective technology policy and sensible innovation law.

Screenshot der ersten "Seite" des Artikels auf dem Verfassungsblog
Publikation Article on Verfassungsblog

DSA Enforcement by the EU Commission

The problematic role of the European Commission in enforcing the Digital Services Act (DSA) and possible alternatives are the focus of a blog post published by Jan-Ole Harfst, Dr. Tobias Mast, and Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Schulz on 16 July 2025 on the Verfassungblog.

Cover der Zeitschrift
Publikation Recently Published

Community Data Trust for Sensitive Data

Jan Rau, Moritz Fürneisen, and Gregor Wiedemann co-developed the concept of community data stewardship to facilitate the collaborative creation and utilization of sensitive data in communication science. By using the example of research into right-wing extremist online communication, they demonstrate how community data stewardship can be structured.

Cover der Zeitschrift UFITA
Publikation Recently Published

On the Public Value of Public Service Media

"What Can Audience Research findings tell us about the public value of public service media?" This question explored by Prof. Dr. Uwe Hasebrink and PD Dr. Jan-Hinrik Schmidt, who published their insights in the issue 2/2024 of the journal UFITA.

Cover der Broschüre zum 75. Geburtstag
Publikation Brochure Available for Download

Facets of 75 Years Hans-Bredow-Institut

With this brochure. we take a look at the institute's development since 1950. While we do not claim to provide a complete history, we aim to highlight some of the institute's unique characteristics, showcasing moments in the past when these features were particularly evident.

Cover von Heft 2/2025 M&K
Publikation Recently Published

M&K 2/2025 Special Issue “Media Structures Revisited”

Issue 2/2025 of Media & Communication Science has been published as a special issue entitled “Media Structures Revisited,” edited by Josef Seethaler, Marlis Prinzing, Petra Herczeg, and Mark Eisenegger. The entire issue is available open access via the Nomos eLibrary.

Cover der Publikation "
Publikation Research Project on Misinformation and Disinformation

Destructive Discourses

The final research report, jointly written as part of the NOTORIOUS research project, looks at how climate-related misinformation and disinformation spreads across different platforms. At the HBI, Philipp Keßling, Dr. Felix Victor Münch, Dr. Gregor Wiedemann, and Mattes Ruckdeschel worked on the report.

Bild des 1600 Seiten starken Kommnatrs
Publikation The most comprehensive HBI publication ever!

DSA DMA Commentary

It is the most extensive publication the HBI has ever produced: the 1600-page commentary on the Digital Services Act (DSA) and the Digital Markets Act (DMA), edited by Tobias Mast, Matthias C. Kettemann, Stephan Dreyer and Wolfgang Schulz. In addition to several current and former researchers from the institute, almost 30 other experts from Germany, Austria and Switzerland were recruited for the commentary project.

Cover des Kurzgutachtens
Publikation Brief Expert Opinion

State Treaty on the Reform of the Procedure for Setting the Broadcasting License Fee

Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Schulz and Dr. Tobias Mast have provided their expert opinion on the State Treaty on the Reform of the Procedure for Setting the Broadcasting Fee (RFinÄStV). At the end of 2004, the federal states had decided to separate the pillars of the reform of public broadcasting and to adopt the draft reform first and to continue the process of reforming the procedure for setting the licence fee separately.

Cover of the first volume of the EU publication series

The Protection of Freedom of Expression in the Digital Services Act

The publication "Der Schutz der Meinungsäusserungsfreiheit im Digital Services Act" [The Protection of Freedom of Expression in the Digital Services Act], to which Matthias C. Kettemann contributed significantly, is the first in a series of KommAustria publications on the DSA, which are intended to provide a basis for understanding the DSA and contribute to a more differentiated discussion.

1 2 3 9

Page 1 from 9

Newsletter

Information about current projects, events and publications of the institute.

Subscribe now